Man gets 5 years in Brunswick Medicare fraud case

May 17th, 2012

BRUNSWICK – An undocumented Armenian will serve five years in prison for laundering money obtained in a massive Medicare fraud scheme that operated from phony clinics in Brunswick and other cities.

Just minutes after U.S. District Judge Lisa Godbey Wood imposed the sentence on Sahak Tumanyan, 44, an federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent served him with deportation papers in the courtroom.

She also ordered him to serve three years’ probation once he’s released and to pay nearly $309,000 restitution.

Woods covered the possible deportation in her sentence, ordering Tumanyan to stay out of the U.S. and any of its territories during his probation should he be deported.

Throughout the proceedings, Tumanyan held a phone to his ear listening to an Armenian interpreter in California. Speaking through the interpreter Tumanyan thanked Wood for the opportunity to speak and said, “Today, I have minor children waiting for me to get home.”

Just before he and his wife, Hasmik, were to go on trial in August, Tumanyan pleaded guilty to money laundering conspiracy in the scheme that operated out of Los Angeles where they lived. In exchange for his plea and assistance in prosecuting a case that stretches through phony clinics across the nation, the government dismissed charges against his wife and asked Wood to impose a more lenient sentence. She declined, saying the penalty called for in federal guidelines was appropriate for the crime and Tumanyan’s involvement.

His involvement was to take the money Medicare paid out for false claims and then pass it through several phony businesses in the Los Angeles area before withdrawing cash, keeping some and passing on the rest to principals in the scheme.

FBI Special Agent Tony Alig testified that $5,433,230 in claims were submitted through Brunswick Medical Supply Inc. for equipment that was never provided. It was nothing more than a shell company through which the conspirators used the stolen identities of Medicare beneficiaries to bill for walkers, canes and other equipment never delivered.

Medicare paid out about $1.5 million of the claims from Brunswick, Alig testified. The reimbursement checks were mailed to Los Angeles, where Tumanyan immediately passed the money through businesses that existed only to launder money, Alig testified.

Sahak and Hasmik Tumanyan set up at least seven accounts and used their home as a phony business address with a cellphone as the business phone, Alig said.

The government presented evidence that Tumanyan showed a level of sophistication although his lawyer, Dominic Cantalupo, characterized him as a dupe acting on the orders of others.

He said Tumanyan had always been hardworking and law abiding and had supported his wife and their two young children.

Should Tumanyan be deported, he would be separated from his wife, also undocumented, and their children, who are U.S. citizens, Cantalupo said.

At that Wood asked, “Is there a block to them doing what they contemplated doing sometime ago? Buying a one-way ticket to Armenia?”

The four tickets that Tumanyan bought but never used had come up as evidence. The government said he had planned to flee to Armenia with his family, which would have obstructed the investigation, but Cantalupo said otherwise.

His real intention was to take his children to Armenia where his family could care for them and then surrender at the U.S. embassy, Cantalupo said.

In sentencing Tumanyan, Wood noted he had made the right decision to stay and face the charges.

“Mr. Tumanyan, you almost made a grave mistake, but you turned back,” she said.

One of the masterminds of the scheme, Arthur Manasarian, also of Los Angeles, also pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit health care fraud and aggravated identity theft. He is serving 14 years in prison and must repay $1.8 million.

Khoren Gasparian, 28, of Las Cruces, N.M., has pleaded guilty to conspiracy and health care fraud and is awaiting sentencing. He willingly returned from Russia to face the charges and assist in the investigation.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Evidence: Trayvon Had Bruised Knuckles, Zimmerman Broken Nose

May 17th, 2012

Meanwhile, the Trayvon Martin autopsy shows that other than his gunshot wound, the only injury on Martin was that the skin on his knuckles was broken. Combined with the evidence from Zimmerman’s medical report, the logical conclusion is that Martin was beating up Zimmerman severely before Zimmerman shot him.

ABC News, of course, is the same outlet that originally released poorly pixelated photos of Zimmerman the night of the incident from the police station with the headline, “Trayvon Martin Video Shows No Blood or Bruises on George Zimmerman.” MSNBC followed suit with an article headlined, “Police video of Zimmerman shows no sign of scuffle.”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Number of babies born to ethnic minorities surpasses whites in U.S. for first time

May 17th, 2012

For the first time, racial and ethnic minorities make up more than half the children born in the U.S., in what has been described as an ‘important landmark’ in the evolution of the country’s demographic.

New census estimates for 2011 highlight sweeping changes in the nation’s racial makeup, capping decades of heady immigration growth that is now slowing.

It also reveals the prolonged impact of a weak economy, which is resulting in fewer Hispanics entering the U.S.

'Important landmark': The number of ethnic and racial minority babies born in the U.S. has exceeded whites for the first time ‘Important landmark’: The number of ethnic and racial minority babies born in the U.S. has exceeded whites for the first time

Changing demographic: A chart showing the breakdown of racial and ethnic minority births for the 12-month period ending July 2011 compared to whitesChanging demographic: A chart showing the breakdown of racial and ethnic minority births for the 12-month period ending July 2011 compared to whites

Minorities made up roughly 2.02 million, or 50.4 per cent of U.S. births in the 12-month period ending July 2011. That compares with 37 per cent in 1990.

Roderick Harrison, a former chief of racial statistics at the Census Bureau who is now a sociologist at Howard University, said: ‘This is an important landmark. This generation is growing up much more accustomed to diversity than its elders.’

In recent years, births have been declining for both whites and minorities as many women held off having children due to the economic slump, although the drop has been larger for whites.

The report comes as the Supreme Court prepares to rule on the legality of Arizona’s strict immigration law, with many states weighing similar get-tough measures.

In flux: A bar chart showing the population projections for the U.S. over the next 40 years. Some now believe ethnic minorities will outnumber whites before 2040In flux: A bar chart showing the population projections for the U.S. over the next 40 years. Some now believe ethnic minorities will outnumber whites before 2040

Mr Harrison said: ‘We remain in a dangerous period where those appealing to anti-immigration elements are fueling a divisiveness and hostility that might take decades to overcome.’

As a whole, the nation’s minority population continues to rise, following a higher-than-expected Hispanic count in the 2010 census.

Minorities increased 1.9 per cent to 114.1 million, or 36.6 per cent of the total U.S. population, lifted by prior waves of immigration that brought in young families and boosted the number of Hispanic women in their prime childbearing years.

But a recent slowdown in the growth of the Hispanic and Asian populations is shifting notions on when the tipping point in U.S. diversity will come – the time when non-Hispanic whites become a minority.

'Dangerous period': Protesters campaign against Arizona's immigration law outside the U.S. Supreme Court, which is reviewing the state's controversial law‘Dangerous period’: Protesters campaign against Arizona’s immigration law outside the U.S. Supreme Court, which is reviewing the state’s controversial law

After 2010 census results suggested a crossover as early as 2040, demographers now believe the pivotal moment may be pushed back several years when new projections are released in December.

The annual growth rates for Hispanics and Asians fell sharply last year to just over two per cent, roughly half the rates in 2000 and the lowest in more than a decade. The black growth rate stayed flat at 1 per cent.

The immigrants staying put in the U.S. for now include Narcisa Marcelino, 34, a single mother who lives with her two daughters, ages 10 and 5, in Martinsburg, West Virginia.

After crossing into the U.S. from Mexico in 2000, she followed her brother to the eastern part of the state just outside the Baltimore-Washington region.

Identities: Census respondents choose their race by selecting either one option (ie- White alone) or more than one option (ie- White in combination). This chart shows the breakdown of those selectionsIdentities: Census respondents choose their race by selecting either one option (ie- White alone) or more than one option (ie- White in combination). This chart shows the breakdown of those selections

 

Fewer white cities: This chart shows that only a handful of cities- like New York, San Diego, LA, San Francisco and Seattle- saw an increase in their non-Hispanic white populations over the past decadeFewer white cities: This chart shows that only a handful of cities- like New York, San Diego, LA, San Francisco and Seattle- saw an increase in their non-Hispanic white populations over the past decade

The Martinsburg area is known for hiring hundreds of migrants annually to work in fruit orchards. Its Hispanic growth climbed from 14 per cent to 18 per cent between 2000 and 2005 before shrinking last year to 3.3 per cent, still above the national average.

Marcelino says she sells food from her home to make ends meet for her family and continues to hope that one day she will get a hearing with immigration officials to stay legally in the U.S.

She aspires to open a restaurant and is learning English at a community college so she can help other Spanish-language speakers.

If she is eventually deported, ‘it wouldn’t be that tragic,’ Marcelino said. ‘But because the children have been born here, this is their country. And there are more opportunities for them here.’

According to the latest data, the percentage growth of Hispanics slowed from 4.2 percent in 2001 to 2.5 percent last year. Their population growth would have been even lower if it weren’t for their relatively high fertility rates – seven births for every death. The median age of U.S. Hispanics is 27.6 years.

Tensions: Angry counter-protesters gather against a white supremacist rally in Los Angeles in 2010. Sociologists fear anti-immigration elements are fueling a divisiveness that could take decades to overcome
A crowd largely made up of Hispanic workers calling for the fair treatment of immigrants at a rally in Mississippi in 2006

Rallies about race: Immigration rights have been a hot-button issue in the past decade, as seen as this Los Angeles rally in 2010 (left) and one in Mississippi in 2006 (right). Sociologists fear anti-immigration elements are fuelling a divisiveness that could take decades to overcome

 

 

Births actually have been declining for both whites and minorities as many women postponed having children during the economic slump. But the drop since 2008 has been larger for whites, who have a median age of 42.

The number of white births fell by 11.4 per cent, compared with 3.2 percent for minorities, according to Kenneth Johnson, a sociologist at the University of New Hampshire.

Blacks, who comprise about 12.3 per cent of the population, have increased at a rate of about 1 percent each year.

In all, 348 of the nation’s 3,143 counties, or 1 in 9, have minority populations across all age groups that total more than 50 percent. In a sign of future U.S. race and ethnic change, the number of counties reaching the tipping point increases to more than 690, or nearly 1 in 4, when looking only at the under age 5 population.

The census report also found that four states — Hawaii, California, New Mexico and Texas — as well as the District of Columbia have minority populations exceeding 50 per cent.

The census estimates used local records of births and deaths, tax records of people moving within the U.S., and census statistics on immigrants. The figures for ‘white’ refer to those whites who are not of Latino ethnicity.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Warning: NM Governor Martinez Starts Pushing Amnesty & Bashing Enforcement

May 17th, 2012

Previously, we have supported New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez (505-476-2200) for her opposition to licenses for illegal aliens since her state is one of the final two states to still give these to illegals.

Unfortunately, today the Washington Post is reporting that she is bashing Mitt Romney‘s support for our ALIPAC platform which points out that most illegal immigrants will “self deport” if we simply adequately enforce our existing immigration laws. We know this is true from examples in American history and from more recent examples where illegals have fled entire states in response to the mere announcement of future enforcement.

Please take 2 minutes this week to call Governor Susana Martinez and tell her your feelings.

Here is the article you need to read, understand, and share first…

Article:
N.M. Gov. Susana Martinez Criticizes Romney’s ‘Self-Deportation’ Idea and Changes to Amnesty Supporter

http://www.alipac.us/content/n-m-gov…n%92-idea-509/

Then call New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez (505-476-2200)

to deliver your own version of our sample messages

“I’m calling to oppose Governor Martinez’s support for Comprehensive Amnesty for illegal aliens. I find her attacks on immigration enforcement hypocritical after her efforts to stop illegals from receiving licenses. I now know that Governor Martinez wants to give both Amnesty and driver licenses to illegal aliens, both of which I oppose. Governor Martinez needs to change her stance, support immigration enforcement and self deportation for illegals and reject Comprehensive and Dream Act Amnesty.”

or

“I’m calling to tell Governor Martinez that I support Mitt Romney and his promise to get more illegal immigrants to self deport from America by enforcing our immigration laws. Many illegal aliens are already self deporting from brave states like Arizona that are cracking down. Many illegal aliens self deported from America when the federal government cracked down in the 1930′s and 1950′s. Governor Martinez needs to learn more about American history and the recent self deportation of illegals before making a fool of herself in the national media.”

or

“I’m calling to tell Governor Martinez I support her efforts to stop illegal immigrants from getting licenses but I strongly oppose her support for Comprehensive Amnesty for illegal aliens. She should support Mitt Romney’s pledge to get more illegal aliens SELF DEPORTING

We need thousands of respectful but firm calls going into Martinez’s offices this week!

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

How I Treat a Speaker by Heringsblatt

May 17th, 2012

The speaker is a creature who knows everything. It is, therefore, unnecessary to meet him at the train station, since he will surely find the way to my house on his own. I live in a suburb outside town, so the two-and-a-half-hour walk will do him good. Speaking is a healthy occupation, after all; they are in good shape. When the speaker arrives at my front door, I’ll still be at the office. Unless my wife is doing something else, she’ll be at home. If she isn’t home, the speaker can certainly find something to do for a while. We have a nice museum, for example, as well as the old Swedish fortifications. If my wife happens to be at home (though why should one assume she would be?), the process is as follows. My wife will bring him to the kitchen. Why should the poor man sit alone in his room and be bored? Neither my wife nor I want that. First my wife, then I, will tell him all our political opinions. We can talk about such matters better than anyone. That’s a good way to start. Then we take out all the old family pictures. This is so exciting that he will scarcely notice the noise of my four children, but rather despite the weariness caused by his long train ride (which isn’t all that bad), he’ll be able to listen attentively to my flow of words. After all, I want to be a speaker too some day. The speaker will see that I am already gifted.

After we have eaten, we go to the meeting. It’s best to go on foot; a little rain doesn’t matter. The meeting begins. My introduction should be as long as possible, since one must become known, after all. It’s a pleasure to hear oneself talk. Then I introduce the speaker, and explain that he will now speak. After the speech, I make sure as many people as possible have a chance to talk to him. I’ve noticed that speakers just beam with joy when lots of people want to talk with them after a speech. If the party propaganda central office has banned discussion periods after speeches, I hold one anyway. People want that in my area, and besides I thereby fight the slogan of the SPD [Socialists]: “The masses will win.”

There are always a lot of people standing around the speaker after the meeting. That’s time time to ask the speaker “How much should I pay you?” Of course, I know that it is uncomfortable for the speaker to ask for an honorarium. He will likely say “the cost of my train ticket, Mr. Heringsblatt.” After all, one has to know to keep one’s local group treasury full. I then pay the speaker what he asks for in coins. That way, everyone knows and hears what he is getting. Why shouldn’t everyone know? Mostly I give the speaker only the return fare or even half of that — he can, I assume, walk the rest of the way!

“You tell me, my friend, that this speaker has over 2000 marks in political fines to pay? Well, I never knowingly engage such a speaker. And please don’t tell anyone, since we surely don’t have the money to help him out!”

After we talk until 3 a.m. in the morning, we head home. You know that I live in the outskirts of the city. Someone takes a shot at us on the way home. My, what times we live in! The speaker sleeps on the sofa in the living room. Party member Knorpel wanted to get him a hotel room with a proper bed, but I want to be sure the speaker has the honor of sleeping on the local group leaders’s sofa. We talk for another hour. Since I have to be up at six, I wake the speaker at 5 to give him the opportunity to bid me farewell. As we part, I encourage him to ask my Gauleiter [the regional party leader] for the part of the honorarium I didn’t pay. My Gauleiter is happy to make up the difference.

Now you know why my local group never has any financial problems.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

A Censored Race War?

May 16th, 2012

When two white newspaper reporters for the Virginian-Pilot were driving through Norfolk, and were set upon and beaten by a mob of young blacks—beaten so badly that they had to take a week off from work—that might seem to have been news that should have been reported, at least by their own newspaper. But it wasn’t.

The O’Reilly Factor” on Fox News Channel was the first major television program to report this incident. Yet this story is not just a Norfolk story, either in what happened or in how the media and the authorities have tried to sweep it under the rug.

Similar episodes of unprovoked violence by young black gangs against white people chosen at random on beaches, in shopping malls or in other public places have occurred in Philadelphia, New York, Denver, Chicago, Cleveland, Washington, Los Angeles and other places across the country. Both the authorities and the media tend to try to sweep these episodes under the rug as well.

In Milwaukee, for example, an attack on whites at a public park a few years ago left many of the victims battered to the ground and bloody. But, when the police arrived on the scene, it became clear that the authorities wanted to keep this quiet.

One 22-year-old woman, who had been robbed of her cell phone and debit card, and had blood streaming down her face said: “About 20 of us stayed to give statements and make sure everyone was accounted for. The police wouldn’t listen to us, they wouldn’t take our names or statements. They told us to leave. It was completely infuriating.”

The police chief seemed determined to head off any suggestion that this was a racially motivated attack by saying that crime is colorblind. Other officials elsewhere have said similar things.

Media outlets that do not report the race of people committing crimes nevertheless report racial disparities in imprisonment and write heated editorials blaming the criminal justice system.

What the authorities and the media seem determined to suppress is that the hoodlum elements in many ghettoes launch coordinated attacks on whites in public places. If there is anything worse than a one-sided race war, it is a two-sided race war, especially when one of the races outnumbers the other several times over.

It may be understandable that some people want to head off such a catastrophe, either by not reporting the attacks in this race war, or not identifying the race of those attacking, or by insisting that the attacks were not racially motivated—even when the attackers themselves voice anti-white invective as they laugh at their bleeding victims.

Trying to keep the lid on is understandable. But a lot of pressure can build up under that lid. If and when that pressure leads to an explosion of white backlash, things could be a lot worse than if the truth had come out earlier, and steps taken by both black and white leaders to deal with the hoodlums and with those who inflame the hoodlums.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Missouri woman pleads guilty to $5 million conspiracy to provide thousands of identity documents to illegal aliens

May 16th, 2012

Kansas City, Mo. — A Missouri woman pleaded guilty in federal court Monday to her role in a more than $5 million conspiracy that utilized the Missouri Department of Revenue license office in St. Joseph to provide more than 3,500 fraudulent identity documents to illegal aliens across the United States.

The guilty plea resulted from an investigation conducted by the following agencies: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations; the Buchanan County (Mo.) Sheriff’s Department; the St. Joseph (Mo.) Police Department; the Platte County (Mo.) Sheriff’s Department; the Missouri State Highway Patrol; the Missouri Department of Revenue Investigation Bureau; the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General; the U.S. Postal Inspection Service; and the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Diplomatic Security.

Christina Michelle Gonzalez, 23, of St. Joseph, Mo., pleaded guilty May 7 before U.S. District Judge Gary A. Fenner to the charges contained in a Jan. 10 federal indictment.

By pleading guilty, Gonzalez admitted to participating in a conspiracy from November 2009 to January 2012 to transport illegal aliens, unlawfully produce identification documents, unlawfully transfer another person’s identification, and commit Social Security fraud.

During the conspiracy, thousands of illegal aliens traveled from across the United States to obtain either a Missouri driver’s or non-driver’s license at the St. Joseph license office by using unlawfully obtained birth certificates and Social Security cards. It is estimated that more than 3,500 licenses were issued to illegal aliens by the Department of Revenue license office in St. Joseph. The state licenses could then be used by the illegal aliens to remain unlawfully in the United States, to unlawfully obtain employment and for other unlawful purposes.

Gonzalez admitted that she accompanied illegal aliens to the St. Joseph license office, under the guise of being a translator, in order to assist them with obtaining a Missouri driver’s or non-driver’s license. Those licenses used the names of persons who were listed on unlawfully obtained birth certificates and Social Security cards.

Gonzalez instructed and assisted the illegal aliens to practice memorizing the information on the birth certificates and Social Security cards and to practice signing the name on those documents so that the signatures would be similar. She also assisted the illegal aliens to prepare for potential questions from the license office employees.

Gonzalez assisted the illegal aliens who did not live in Missouri by providing them with a Missouri residential address to use in order to obtain the Missouri driver’s or non-driver’s license.

The illegal aliens were usually charged between $1,500 and $1,600 for the document sets and the Missouri driver’s and non-driver’s licenses. Gonzalez collected money from the illegal aliens, which she paid to her co-conspirators. It is estimated that more than $5,250,000 in gross proceeds was paid by illegal aliens to members of this conspiracy.

Under federal statutes, Gonzalez is subject to a sentence of up to five years in federal prison without parole, plus a fine up to $250,000. A sentencing hearing will be scheduled after the completion of a pre-sentence investigation by the United States Probation Office.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jess E. Michaelsen, Western District of Missouri, is prosecuting the case.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

A Selection of Lies about Hitler

May 16th, 2012

Nothing better demonstrates the great hatred the parties responsible for Germany’s misery have for Hitler than a selection of the lies that they spread about him. And nothing speaks more for Hitler.

The Center Party and its allies in the “Bavarian People’s Party” lied: Adolf Hitler is member of the “Free of Rome movement.” When this was proven to be untrue, the Center Party lied that it was true of Hitler’s father. Furthermore: As a child, Hitler supposedly spit on the host. He is a covert Bolshevist.

The S.P.D. lied: Hitler supposedly had “Champagne parties with beautiful women;” the Kaiser paid Hitler for his activities; Hitler received money from “Horthy’s Hungary.” Hitler’s supporters are supposedly “miserable creatures,” reactionary officers, and students. Hitler is a “slave of the capitalists.”

The S.P.D. and Center Party lied: Hitler betrayed South Tyrol and was rewarded with money from Italy.

They lied: Hitler supposedly received money from a number of big industrialists so that he would use his forces to break strikes.

They lied: Hitler supposedly received money from Jews.

They lied: Hitler supposedly received money from Ford.

The S.P.D. lied: Hitler supposedly received money from Borsig.

The S.P.D. and Center Party lied: Hitler supposedly was engaged to a Jew.

The Bavarian Center Party (BPP) had a Catholic priest spread lies that as a child, Adolf Hitler spat on the host, although this accusation had already been proven false.

The S.P.D. lied: Adolf Hitler supposedly received French funds. The Berliner Tageblatt, close to the Marxists, worked to spread this lie throughout the world.

The Münchener Telegrammzeitung, which the S.P.D. and Center Party often use against Hitler, maintain that Hitler supposedly gave an ultimatum to Crown Prince Rupprecht.

The Center Party lied: Hitler supposedly had a luxurious 12-room house; he supposedly had a luxurious villa in Berchtesgaden.

The S.P.D. and Center Party lied: There was a tapestry supposedly worth 80,000 Marks in the Brown House[the Nazi headquarters in Munich], a banister worth 30,000 Marks, a 3,000 Mark wood-carved chair. Hitler’s office was supposedly modeled after Mussolini’s.

The S.P.D. lied: Hitler supposedly received money from Switzerland.

The S.P.D. lied: Hitler supposedly had negations with separatist leader Heinz Orbis.

The S.P.D. and Center Party published articles in their newspapers, and the Münchner Telegrammzeitung,based on an alleged letter claiming that Hitler received 5,000,000 Marks from Russia for the election. (The proof for the alleged document’s falsity was that it had a form of his signature that Hitler no longer used at the time. As a result, even the Soviet Russian government had to distance itself from the forgery.)

The S.P.D. lied: Hitler supposedly received a prison sentence for deserting the German army, for which he received amnesty from Kurt Eisner (the slanderer had to pay a 50 Mark fine!)

The S.P.D. lied: Hitler supposedly ordered Jewish cemeteries to be desecrated. (Even Berlin Police President Bernhard Weiß had to admit under oath that he knew of no case of grave desecration by National Socialists.)

The Center Party lied: Adolf Hitler supposedly said in his book Mein Kampf that lies may be used in any situation. The cited passage was false from start to finish.

The S.P.D. lied: Hitler supposedly sent one of his representatives to Paris to negotiate a German-French military agreement with France.

The S.P.D. and Center Party lied: Hitler supposedly stated that in the Third Reich, all handicapped children will be killed.

The S.P.D. lied: S.A. people were supposedly used by industry to break strikes.

The S.P.D. lied: Hitler supposedly was paid 2,000 Marks for each meeting he spoke at.

The S.P.D. lied: Hitler supposedly wanted to introduce forced labor for the unemployed, but National Socialists would be exempt.

The S.P.D. spreads false lists of people supposedly killed by the National Socialists.

The S.P.D. lied: Hitler supposedly had his representative Göring secure a 16-room mansion in Berlin.

The S.P.D. and Center Party lied: Hitler was supposedly Czech. When this could no longer be defended, they changed it so that Hitler’s mother was supposedly a Czech who always spoke the Czech language.

The German National Commercial Assistance Federation (D.H.B.) lied: Hitler supposedly wanted to destroy the unions.

The S.P.D. lied: After his speech in Düsseldorf, Hitler supposedly had a fancy dinner with the industrialists.

The S.P.D. lied: Schneider-Creuzot supposedly gave Hitler money.

The Center Party and S.P.D. lied: Hitler supposedly no longer believes in his mission or in wining the presidential election.

The S.P.D. lied: Japan supposedly gave Hitler money.

The S.P.D. lies today: If elected Reich President, Hitler would supposedly cut all pensions.

The S.P.D. lies today: Foreign countries, above all France, would supposedly not tolerate Hitler as president, German credit would be destroyed, etc., the same things they said in 1925 about a Hindenburg presidency.

The “middle class papers,” along with the S.P.D. and Center Party, lie: Hitler supposedly wanted at first to extend Hindenburg’s term, but was dissuaded through Hugenberg’s influence. A “nationalist” paper took on the forgery of a French newspaper about a supposed Hitler representative, who never existed.

The S.P.D. lies today: Hitler supposedly receives some of the profits of the Völkischer Beobachter, a party salary, and a fee for each of his meetings. This totals, supposedly, 433,200 Marks a year.

The S.P.D. lies today: “To save money,” Hitler would supposedly kill everyone over the age of 60.

The S.P.D. and Center Party lie today: Hitler would supposedly fire all employed women.

The S.P.D. lies today: Hitler’s father originally had a Czech name, only later replacing it with a German name.

During his political career, Hitler instituted 123 cases against such lies. As it gradually became clear that no reasonable person believed these lies any longer, he only went after occasional examples of the crassest cases.

So it was with claims of accepting French money, Italian money, betraying South Tyrol, desecrating the host, making an ultimatum to Crown Prince Rupprecht, discussions with Heinz Orbis, desecrating Jewish cemeteries, forgeries from his book, deserting the Austrian army, fleeting the front, etc. All the court verdicts, of course, were in his favor. The total of the resulting fines and prison terms was considerable, even if in some cases they were inappropriately lenient.

A new flood of lies gushed over Hitler and his surroundings during the Reich presidential election. Forged letters, forged police reports on interrogations of his staff, were spread about. With interest, but calmly, Hitler and his staff are ready for new lies prepared for the election.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

What are Hitler’s Goals?

May 16th, 2012

Hitler’s goals are:

Achieving freedom for the German people,

Achieving its proper place among the peoples,

Building the foundations for its ability to survive.

Hitler is convinced that freedom for the German people and its appropriate position among the peoples can be gained through entirely peaceful methods. The prerequisite is the firm and consistent leadership of German foreign policy that, combined with a corresponding domestic policy rooted in a people that once again has the will to assert itself, will convince foreign states that Germany is a valuable partner. Hitler wants to work together with states that have interests that allow, or even require, working together with Germany. Instead of emotional policies, he favors a policy of selfinterest, which recognizes the same factor as the driving force of the policies of all peoples.

This requires the organization of the domestic life of a people according to the principles that will best enable it to face the rest of the world, and so support the necessary foreign policy. This means replacing the system of irresponsible leadership based on decisions made by a parliamentary majority of amateurs with a system based on the personal responsibility of a capable leader, supported by the advice of experts. It means the replacement of the majority with the value of personality. It means awakening and increasing the feeling of the superiority of one’s own race. It means eliminating Jewish-Bolshevist manifestations in all areas of culture.

It means the greatest possible support for the economy, and the use of all suitable methods to bring the unemployed back into the production process to add new purchasing power and new opportunities for the domestic markets. It means the gradual reduction of excessive taxes, and a return to a tax system characterized by a few easily understood taxes. It means a reduction in excessive interest rates, above all with respect to foreign debts. It means stable prices, which permit long-term planning. It means the protection of domestic production, in particular agricultural production, since agriculture provides our food and is the prerequisite for the independence, and therefore the freedom, of the nation: It is the source of the renewal of the people’s blood, replacing what big cities suck out of it and destroy.

Capital and labor are equally essential for highly developed economy. Neither of the two factors can benefit at the cost of the other — which, in the long one, would lead both to suffer. Therefore, class struggle must be eliminated, and class differences bridged. This requires a just distribution of economic success. Community spirit and mutual confidence, hand in hand with the regulatory activity of the state when required, will create the foundation for healthy economic growth.

Hitler refuses to provide details as to how his goals will be reached, since experience shows that the present government adopts at least parts of such plans, usually in an incomplete manner — thereby avoiding a really effective attack on the root cause, such as unemployment — which discredits them, since there is no healthy and constructive result. Hitler’s plans, which the government at first does not intend to follow, are criticized in public by “experts,” or even made ludicrous. One only need mentionthe National Socialist proposal in the Reichstag a year and a half ago to require a general reduction in interest rates. It was attacked from all sides. When, after a long time, the Brüning government decided to proceed according to the National Socialist proposal, it turned out that the measure was entirely practical and effective, and the “unacceptable consequences” that the experts predicted would result from the National Socialist proposal did not occur.

One may be persuaded that the same is true of the other measures Hitler plans to save countless individuals, the economy, and the entire nation. This is even more the case, since Hitler does not plan risky or amateurish experiments, but rather to follow the advice of leading and recognized experts in all areas.

The man who, because of his extraordinary knowledge and ability in all areas, was able to rise from nothing to his present position as the leader of millions in Germany, despite tremendous resistance, is perhaps the only one who has the ability to master the enormous tasks, rescuing the nation at the eleventh hour from its almost hopeless situation. Led by fate, he followed his path. It would not be the first time in history that Germany was rescued by the right man in its greatest need!

Each must therefore be aware of the responsibility that he bears if he hinders Hitler from taking the fate of the people in his hands, particularly in view of the failure of previous governments.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Lie: Reaction!

May 15th, 2012

With a great deal of noise and a lot of wasted ink, the Red benefactors of the people accuse the Nazis of being evil reactionaries.

When the National Socialist movement was in its beginnings, the Red papers sneered at it as an insignificant offshoot of the German National Party. That will not work any longer, for even the most stubborn Marxist realizes that this is something new, a movement following its own victorious ideas. If the NSDAP had been only an offshoot of the German Nationalists, it would never have achieved such great success. Its rise, which shows that new, revolutionary elements are at work, refutes the myth of the “reactionary” Nazis better than all the speeches.

Enemy of the workers

The sensationalist newspapers lie when they say: The Nazis are enemies of the workers, they want to destroy the unions and reduce wages.

To make these lies believable to German workers, the Red press pirates do not hold back from even the most insolent lies. The National Socialist Hans Held allegedly described how we lie in the National Socialist monthly Der Meister:

“We National Socialists are taking over your workers’ organizations. We are taking over your unions. The businessmen and big capitalists are giving us permission to adjust our agitation to the working class. If we speak of nationalizing land, we do not mean it. If we speak against capital, we need it as a propaganda tool to attract people to us. The main thing is that we have the people, that we pull them away from Marxism.”

One does not know whether to be most astounded by the filthy insolence or the blatant stupidity of these falsifications. But the best part of it is that there is neither a National Socialist named Hans Held, nor a National Socialist monthly titled Der Meister. The monthly Der Meister is still edited by Artur Mahraun, the head of the Young German Order — who, as is well known, co-founded the Jewish State Party in 1930 and is a bitter enemy of the NSDAP.

Since they lack any kind of support for the lie about National Socialism’s alleged intent to reduce wages, they do not bother to try to prove it.

The best refutation of both Social Democratic lies is given by Adolf Hitler himself in his book Mein Kampf, the standard work of the NSDAP:

“As long as there are employers who lack social understanding and have wrong ideas of justice and fair play it is not only the right but also the duty of their employees — who are, after all, an integral part of our people — to protect the general interests against the greed and unreason of the individual. For to safeguard the loyalty and confidence of the people is as much in the interests of the nation as to safeguard public health.

No. If unsocial and dishonorable treatment of men provokes resistance, then the stronger party can impose its decision in the conflict until the legal legislative authorities do away with the evil. Therefore it is evident that if the individual workman is to have any chance at all of winning through in the struggle he must be joined with his fellow workmen and present a united front before the individual employer, who incorporates in his own person the massed strength of the vested interests in the industrial or commercial undertaking which he conducts.

Thus the trade unions can inculcate and strengthen a sense of social responsibility in daily life and open the road to practical results. In doing this they remove those causes of friction which are a continual source of discontent and complaint.

In the present state of affairs, I am convinced that we cannot possibly dispense with the trade unions. On the contrary, they are among the most important institutions in the economic life of the nation. Not only are they important in the sphere of social policy but also, and even more so, in the national political sphere. For when the great masses of a people see their vital needs satisfied through a just trade union movement, and are educated at the same time, the stamina of the whole nation in its struggle for existence will be enormously strengthened.

Above all else, the trades unions are necessary as a foundation for the future economic parliament, or the chambers representing the various professions and occupations.”

The sensationalist Red newspapers know all that, but they keep lying because they have to lie. The lie is their only weapon.

A speech by Comrade Fritz Tarnow to the Reichsbanner agitation meeting in the Berlin Sportpalast on 2 December 1931 proves the insolence of the Social Democratic betrayers of the workers as they go about their campaign of lies against National Socialism. The same Tarnow, who called social democracy “a doctor at capitalism’s sickbed” at the Leipzig Party conference, declared, according Vorwärts:

“The battle of the National Socialist front against the republic, against democracy and parliamentarianism, against the citizenship rights of the broad masses, is fundamentally nothing other than a general attack on the social position of the working masses.”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share