Posts Tagged ‘London’

Is This the Most Brutal Thug in Britain? Sickening CCTV Shows the Moment Girl, 16, Is Punched So Hard from Behind by Total Stranger She Is Knocked out Cold

Wednesday, November 21st, 2012

This is the shocking moment a 16-year-old girl was beaten unconscious and fell headfirst onto the pavement after a thug ran up from behind and knocked her out cold.

The teenager, whose face has been blurred to protect her identity, was innocently walking along the the road in Plaistow, east London, last Tuesday when she was savagely attacked in broad daylight.

At just after 12.30pm the thug is shown running up behind the teenager and taking a massive swing with his right fist, causing the teen to black out instantly and crash to the ground.

He then turns and runs off, leaving the 16-year-old smartly dressed girl lying unconscious on the pavement.
Police today released the footage as officers try to trace the vile thug, who attacked the girl just outside the Black Lion pub on Plaistow High Street.

The teen was taken to Newham General Hospital with bruising and cuts to her head and face, but was released the same day after a series of tests.

The suspect is described by police ‘muscularly built’ black male with a shaven head and around 6ft tall and police say he followed the girl from her home – around one-third of a mile away from where the attack took place.

They said he was wearing baseball jacket and jeans and is aged between 25 and 30.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

The Secrets of a 5,500-Year-Old Mummy Murder Mystery,

Wednesday, November 21st, 2012

Forensic scientists have moved closer to solving a 5,500-year-old cold case crime after new technology allowed them to study fatal wounds on the body of a famous mummy.

The corpse, known officially as the Gebelein Man, has been nicknamed Ginger due to his red hair and seen by millions of visitors to the British Museum.

Experts, who used digital images and scanning technology, have now concluded he was almost certainly murdered by an assailant who caught him by surprise.

His injuries suggest he was the victim of a deliberate, violent killing during a period of peace, with his shoulder blade damaged and the rib underneath shattered in a manner consistent with a stab wound.

That, in combination with a lack of defensive wounds, indicates Ginger was caught by surprise and stabbed in the back as he went about his daily business.

The mummy, which has lain in the British Museum since 1901, was moved temporarily to Cromwell Hospital in West London to undergo a CAT scan, allowing experts to study his internal organs for the first time.

Ginger is now believed to have been aged between 18 and 21 when he died, with developed muscles. He was stabbed by a blade of copper or flint at least five inches long.

Daniel Antoine, curator of physical anthropology at the museum said: “Not only have we been able to discover that Gebelein Man was young when he died but, unexpectedly, the 3D visualisation of the CT scan has confirmed that he was stabbed in the back.

“The analysis of ancient human remains rarely reveals the cause of death but the cut on his back, as well as the damage to the underlying shoulder blade and rib, are characteristic of a single penetrating wound.”

He added the lack of defensive wounds suggests Ginger was caught by surprise rather than being killed in battle.

Experts found the blow, delivered to his shoulder blade, was so forceful it shattered a rib immediately, embedding bone fragments into his muscle tissue, and injuring the left lung and surrounding blood vessels.

The absence of any signs of healing and the severity of the injuries suggest that this can be considered the cause of death, a spokeswoman for the British Museum said.

Visitors to the museum can now use a touch screen on the “virtual operating table” to examine the body more closely than ever before, in an attempt to find clues about his life and death.

The body was discovered in 1896 in a shallow grave in the Egyptian sand. He is believed to have lived around 3,500 BC in an area close to the Nile and about 25 miles south of Thebes.

He is considered to be of the best-preserved mummies in the world, after the heat and sand combined to keep his body largely in tact.

It is not known whether Ginger’s murderer was ever caught.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Bombers: Germany, Zeppelins

Saturday, October 13th, 2012

Balloonshad been used in wars prior to the First World War, notably by the Americans in the civil war and the French during the siege of Paris in 1870.  This technology had been advanced by the development of dirigibles – cigar shaped airships with frames, containing many gas balloons.  Powered with multiple engines, these craft could be flown in specific directions rather than just follow the direction of the wind.

Germany had two dirigible manufacturers, the Schutte-Lanz Company, and the larger and better known Zeppelin Company.  The latter was headed by Ferdinand von Zeppelin, the world’s foremost designer of airships.  To this day his name remains synonymous with dirigibles in general.

Airships of his design had already proven themselves capable of flying as far as England and back.  This fact was not lost on the Allies, who from the very outset targeted the airship sheds.  It was also not lost on the British public, where rumours and reported sightings of Zeppelins were frequent, though unfounded, throughout 1914.

At the outbreak of the war the German army had six operational dirigibles, and the navy had one.  The army was quick to experiment with them – bombing Liege and Antwerp - despite the fact that at this stage no specially designed aerial bombs existed.  But the army’s initial experience was not encouraging – they lost three airships in the first months of the war to anti aircraft fire.

Despite this the navy was very enthusiastic.  They saw the Zeppelin as a solution to their reconnaissance problems.  If the army traditionally used the cavalry for reconnaissance, the navy traditionally used the light cruiser.  Germany had very few such ships, and an airship was viewed as being cheaper and less vulnerable.

Framework of a Zeppelin shot down over England, 23 Sep 1916Under the command of Korvettenkapitan Peter Strasser the navy quickly acquired more airships.  Throughout 1914 these were used for reconnaissance patrols over the North Sea, but the German Admiralty was pressing for permission to use them for attacks against England.  The Kaiser, somewhat reluctantly, granted such permission and on the 19th of January the Germans carried out the first Zeppelin raid against Britain, killing two and injuring sixteen.

This was the first of many raids, which continued at a rate of about two per month, in parallel with the continuing reconnaissance patrols.  The German Admiralty was very enthusiastic about the results, and asked for permission to bomb London.  This was only granted by the Kaiser after a series of raids by French bombers on German cities.  On the 31st of May 1915 the first raid was carried out against London, killing seven and injuring thirty five.

The most successful Zeppelin raid on London in the entire war was on the 8th of September 1915.  This raid caused more than half a million pounds of damage, almost all of it from the one Zeppelin, the L13, which managed to bomb central London.  This single raid caused more than half the material damage caused by all the raids against Britain in 1915.

On the night of 6-7 June 1915 Rex Warneford, a lieutenant in the RNAS, flying a Morane-Saulnier, was on a bombing mission against the Zeppelin sheds at Evere.  When he spotted a Zeppelin returning from a bombing raid against London he decided to attack it.  He tried shooting his carbine at it, his only armament, but he was driven off by the Zeppelin’s defensive machine guns.

The airship began climbing, leaving the little plane behind, but Warneford, unbeknown to the Zeppelin crew, continued the pursuit, climbing slowly over two hours to an altitude of 13,000 feet.  At this stage the airship began to descend in the direction of Brussels, and seizing his opportunity Warneford, now above the Zeppelin, dived towards it and from about two hundred feet above he dropped his six bombs on its roof.

Effects of Zeppelin attack on AntwerpThe resultant explosion destroyed the Zeppelin, and almost destroyed Warneford’s fragile monoplane.

He was forced to put the plane down, behind enemy lines, but he managed to make sufficient emergency repairs to take off again and return to his base.  LZ 37 was the first Zeppelin brought down by an airplane.

Warneford was awarded the Victoria Cross by the British, and the Knight’s Cross of the Legion d’Honneur by the French, but his triumph was short-lived.  He was killed ten days later in a flying accident.

This was an isolated incident.  Throughout the remainder of 1915 the Zeppelins raided London frequently, and with impunity.  They flew too high for most planes, and when they were intercepted by aircraft the ammunition in use at the time had little effect.  Despite this impunity the material effect of the raids, with the exception of L13′s success, was relatively slight.

Navigation was very primitive, and as the war progressed the British use of blackouts made it even harder.  Bomb aiming was far from accurate.  It is estimated that only 10% of the bombs dropped from Zeppelins actually hit their target.  The psychological impact of these raids, however, was enough to cause the British to tie up 12 squadrons on home defence.

The Germans also bombed Paris.  The first raid was on 21st of March, when two Zeppelins caused 23 deaths and injured 30.  Although the Zeppelins continued to raid Paris, London was actually a preferred and easier target.  The nearest Zeppelin base to Paris was at Metz, which meant flying close to 320 km (200 miles) over French territory each way, giving the defending airforce and anti-aircraft guns much more time to organize.

Raids against London had to cover nearly twice the distance, but most of the approach was over friendly territory and the sea.  Paris was also protected by barrage balloons, a measure only taken by the British later in the war.

Ferdinand von Zeppelin1916 did not start well for the Zeppelins.  Four of them were lost carrying out bombing raids during the Battle of Verdun, and this marked the last use of airships for tactical bombing.  But Strasser remained confident.  The Zeppelin factory was producing a new generation of airships – larger, more powerful, and with more engines.

But it was also a year of change on the British side as well.  Disappointment with the RNAS’ failure to stop the Zeppelins resulted in the responsibility of home defence being given to the RFC.  Happily for them this coincided with the arrival of improved ammunition.

Towards mid 1916 the British planes were armed with a mixture of explosive and incendiary bullets.  This mixture would prove to be deadly to the airships: the explosive bullets could pierce the Zeppelin’s tough outer skin and cause leaks on the inner gas bags.  The incendiary bullets could set those leaks on fire, and once on fire a Zeppelin was doomed.

William Leefe-Robinson, flying a BE2c, was the first to shoot down a dirigible over Britain, on the 2nd of September, 1916.  The massive fire of the burning airship was visible for over a hundred miles.  This was during a raid of twelve naval airships which were, somewhat unusually, accompanied by four army airships.  Leefe-Robinson became an instant hero.  He survived the war, only to die a month later in the influenza epidemic.

Strasser’s confidence remained unshaken.  Leefe-Robinson had shot down the SL11.  It was an army airships, not one of Strasser’s, and moreover an old Schutte-Lanz dirigible with a wooden frame.

William Leefe-RobinsonBut Strasser’s confidence was misplaced.  Three weeks later he was to lose two airships, out of a total of twelve taking part in a raid.  There were no comforting explanations.  They were naval airships.  They were the most up to date Zeppelins available.

The L33 had been hit by anti aircraft fire.  She did not catch fire, but she was forced to land in England.  The crew all survived, and set her alight before capture.  The L32 was shot down by a plane, and as in the case of Leefe-Robinson’s SL11, it caught fire.  Nor were these the last losses in 1916.

Despite flying almost four times as many sorties as in 1915, and dropping almost five times as many bombs, Strasser’s fleet caused only about two thirds as much damage as they had in 1915.

The German military was becoming disillusioned with the Zeppelins, and began using the new Gotha and Giant bombers to attack Britain, but Strasser remained convinced.  The answer was to fly higher, above the defending aircraft.  Thus was conceived the third generation of Zeppelins, the “Height Climbers”, airships capable of reaching an altitude of 20,000 feet.

In order to reach these heights defensive armaments were reduced, as was the strength of the frame.  Flying at such altitudes produced a whole new set of problems.  The extreme cold and thin oxygen affected both the engines, and the crew’s capability to function.

Bomb aiming and navigation became even harder.  But with the renewed immunity the height seemed to offer, it seemed worth the price.  Indeed, when on the night of October 19th 1917 a fleet of eleven Height-Climbers crossed the English coast they were too high to be heard, and their raid was a total surprise.

But on the return journey, over the European mainland, almost half the airships were shot down by British and French fighter aircraft as they descended towards landing.  The L55 had attempted to avoid this risk by keeping at 20,000 feet till it had cleared the western front, but this caused other problems.  The morning sun heating the hydrogen forced the L55 to a record-breaking 24,000 feet.  With most of the crew disabled by oxygen deprivation it was a struggle to bring her under almost partial control.  The L55 crash landed in central Germany.

The total amount of material damage caused by the airships in 1917 was less than 90,000 pounds.

1918 started badly for the beleaguered airship fleet, when a series of unexplained explosions at the airship base in Ahlhorn blew up four Height-Climbers, one Schutte-Lanz airship, and four sheds.  German manufacturing by this time had been greatly reduced, and they could not replenish such losses.

Hugo Eckener, Ferdinand von Zeppelin, Peter StrasserOn the 5th of August Strasser himself led the last big raid against Britain, leading a fleet of five Height-Climbers.  Strasser was flying in L70 – his most advanced airship, capable, he hoped, of flying bombing missions against New York.  But by this time the British had aircraft that could operate at about 20,000 feet as well, and L70 succumbed to a two man DH4 piloted by Egbert Cadbury.  (He was a member of the famous chocolate manufacturing family.)

The fatal shots were fired by his gunner, Robert Leckie, whose hands were almost frozen because he had not had time to put on gloves when he and Cadbury had scrambled to chase the Zeppelins.  The rest of the airships dropped their bombs on what they thought were “targets of opportunity”, but in fact they dropped them in the sea.

The Zeppelin attacks had a profound psychological impact on the Allies.  The Germans were ordered, under the treaty of Versailles, to hand over all their airships, but their crews preferred to destroy as many of them as they could.

The need to tie up numerous squadron in home defence can be marked as the Zeppelin’s greatest achievement, for as a weapon of war they proved themselves unsatisfactory.  Of the 115 Zeppelins employed by the Germans, 53 were destroyed and a further 24 were too damaged to be operational.  Strasser’s crews suffered a 40% loss rate.  The cost of constructing those 115 Zeppelins was approximately five times the cost of the damage they inflicted.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Murder probe man charged with fraud

Sunday, August 5th, 2012

A man arrested in connection with the murder and kidnap of oil executive Carole Waugh has been charged with four counts of conspiracy to commit fraud, Scotland Yard said on Saturday.

Nicholas David Kutner, 47, of no fixed abode, is accused of pretending to be Chris Waugh, Ms Waugh’s brother, in a bid to sell her London home.

He also faces two charges relating to renting her property at Tressard Court and a fourth of unlawfully withdrawing funds from the 50-year-old’s bank account.

Miss Waugh, originally from Durham but living in London, had not been seen by her family since mid-April. Her body was found with a single stab wound inside a car at the garage in Lime Court, New Malden, south-west London, on Thursday night.

The Metropolitan Police said Kutner was bailed to return to a police station on August 25 relating to his arrest on suspicion of murder and kidnap last Wednesday.

But he has not been freed because he is being held in custody on the fraud charges ahead of an appearance by video link at Camberwell Green Magistrates’ Court on Monday.

Kutner has been charged with committing fraud along with unemployed Rakesh Bhayani.

Bhayani, 40, of Chamberlayne Avenue, Wembley, was one of four men and two women arrested by Scotland Yard officers last month in connection with the inquiry into what was then the disappearance of Ms Waugh.

He appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on three charges of conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation relating to transactions associated with Ms Waugh’s identity worth around £280,000 and remanded in custody to appear at Southwark Crown Court on 25 September.

The five other suspects have been bailed pending further investigations.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Selective Outrage: How the U.K. Press Reacted to Obama’s Numerous Anti-British Gaffes

Saturday, July 28th, 2012

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s “gaffe” in Great Britain on Thursday, in which he called into question London’s security preparations ahead of the Olympics, has been greeted with a mix of scorn and glee in both the British and American press. Hours after the Telegraph reported that a rogue Romney advisor said that his presidency would usher in a return to America’s traditional respect for the United States’ “Anglo-Saxon heritage,” a phrase which has been willfully misconstrued to mean the Romney camp’s support for racially discriminatory and white supremacist policies, Romney stepped in it yet again. Now the British press is having some fun with Romney’s slap at London’s Olympic preparedness, but the Forth Estate in England has been far from neutral towards President Barack Obama’s numerous anti-British gaffes. Indeed, they have been rather forgiving. In light of this most recent misstep by Romney, it’s worth a look back at how the British press treated some of the President’s famous misstatements.

In 2009, when President Obama presented Queen Elizabeth II with a gift of an iPod populated with a variety of pictures and songs tailored to the Queen’s liking, the Guardian gushed. “Clearly a lot of thought went into this gift, as President Obama made no secret of his excitement at the prospect of meeting the Queen,” wrote The Guardian’s Rosie Swash. The President’s gift to then-Prime Minister Gordon Brown was a series of DVDs. Most of the British press was “appalled,” but the Guardian noted in the headline “it’s the thought that counts.”

When Michelle Obama met Queen Elizabeth for the first time, she broke with accepted decorum by wrapping a friendly arm around her back. The Telegraph’s headline? “Renewing a very Touching Relationship.”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Tories Fail to Solve Immigration Crisis that Blights Britain

Saturday, July 21st, 2012

No greater bunch of treacherous charlatans ever held office than the last Labour Government.

Without any consent from the British people, this gang of traitors enacted an unparalleled social revolution in our country by promoting by mass immigration on an epic scale.

Our national identity was shattered, our mutual sense of belonging obliterated and our civic infrastructure put under intolerable strain.

Tragically, the Tory-led Coalition has dismally failed to reverse this disastrous trend.

From Ministers, we have had nothing but hollow words. The colonisation of Britain by foreigners continues to accelerate.

A limited insight into the impact of Labour’s open door policy will be provided today by the release of the first results from the 2011 Census, which was conducted last March at a cost to the taxpayer of £480 million.

The findings are expected to show that during the last decade the British population increased by more than 3 million people, up from 58.8 million in 2001 to over 62 million last year, with at least 7 million of them foreign nationals.

Yet, for all the shock that these figures might generate, they are likely to be a gross underestimate of the real effect

of mass immigration.

The true size of British population may actually be much bigger than today’s survey indicates, for there are a number of serious flaws with the current Census.

One is the simple fact that the information has already become hopelessly out of date, thanks to the unprecedented and growing waves of immigration.

In 2011, an incredible 593,000 foreigners, mostly from Asia and Africa, came to settle in Britain, an increase on 2010

when 582,000 immigrants arrived here.

Moreover, migrant families tend to have far more children than the indigenous population, further speeding up the rate of change. Indeed more than a quarter of babies now born in Britain have foreign mothers, while in London the figure rises to almost 60 per cent.

At that level of demographic upheaval, a single snapshot taken once a decade is almost useless.

Furthermore, the methodology used by the Census is dangerously unreliable in an age of flux.

Dating back to pre-Victorian times, it relies on householders filling in the longwinded forms, backed up by threats of fines for those who refuse. But it is not difficult to evade, given the serial incompetence of the state’s bureaucracy.

Nor does the threat of prosecution carry much weight in a justice system that refuses to jail serious offenders or

deport foreign criminals.

The 2001 Census was a byword for inaccuracy, with huge gaps that had to be filled in by guesswork.

Slough Council, for instance, said that no fewer 30,000 people in the borough were missed.

It is unlikely that the 2011 version will be any better.

Crucially, the Government machine has a vested interest in downplaying the number of immigrants living here.

For if the true picture were presented, most of the British public would be outraged. Yet through the fog of official

manipulation and propaganda, the alarming reality can sometimes be glimpsed.

According to the Conservative MP Greg Hands, a leading figure at the TESCO supermarket chain said in 2008 that “they estimate the population of the UK to be closer to 80 million, based on the volume of certain staples that they sell.”

This is backed up a major, non-commercial agricultural institution which reckoned that there are 77 million people currently in the UK, this figure again based on how much we eat.

Such estimates make sense.

Our border controls are notoriously inadequate, while the Home Office admits that it “hasn’t a clue” how many illegal

immigrants are living in this country.

Moreover, the total of National Insurance numbers dished out by the Government is far higher than the official

level of immigration. Between 2004 and 2007, 270,000 work permits were issued by the Government to non-European nationals, yet over 900,000 National Insurance numbers were issued.

As a graphic illustration of this farce, just 1455 Nigerians were given leave to enter Britain in this period, yet 35,900 Nigerians got NI numbers.

We can see with our own eyes how immigration is transforming Britain far more radically than officialdom ever admits.

All around us are over-stretched public services and overcrowded roads. Vast swathes of our urban landscape, dominated by the babble of foreign tongues, squalid markets or ethnic gangs, no longer resemble Britain any more.

The great lie perpetrated by the Labour Government was that the mass immigration was a means of improving our country. The tidal wave of foreigners would not only raise our prosperity but also enrich our culture, claimed the Labour politicians.

But the opposite has been true. Immigration has been a vehicle for economic destruction and social disintegration.

With 90 per cent of new jobs going to foreigners, millions of Britons have been thrown on the economic scrapheap, while the taxpayer has had to cope with the mammoth costs of providing healthcare, schooling, welfare and social housing to much of the migrant population.

And far from enriching Britain, mass immigration has led to the import of crime, terrorism, misogyny, superstition, and

barbarity from the developing world.

We were once one of the most gentle, well-ordered places on earth.

Now we are plagued by female circumcision and honour killings, forced marriages and Sharia law. Similarly our democratic system, which relied on trust, is now awash with mass voter fraud, most of it arising in Asian.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

1-in-5 rape and murder suspects are migrant

Thursday, July 19th, 2012

Data obtained from police forces across England and Wales shows how people arrested for major crimes come from all over the globe.

 

A total of 91 foreign nationals were charged with murder and 406 accused of rape last year.

 

In London, of the 547 people charged with rape in the past 12 months, 174 were non-UK citizens.

 

They included immigrants from Afghanistan, Angola, Ghana, Macedonia, Russia, Zimbabwe and Chile.

 

The nations whose individuals were charged the most frequently with rape in the capital were Jamaica, 19 suspects, Nigeria, 11, Poland, ten, and Australia, nine. Also in London, a total of 197 people were charged with murder — including 40 immigrants.

 

In Kent, a staggering 53 per cent of the 17 murder suspects were non-UK citizens, including four people from India and three from Romania.

In South Yorkshire, of the 22 people charged with murder, six were non-UK. The figures — obtained by The Sun under Freedom of Information rules — raise serious questions over the Government’s immigration policy and the need for tighter controls.

 

In April last year illegal immigrant Yonas Beraki, 34, returned to Britain from Eritrea, East Africa, to murder his ex-girlfriend — after being deported THREE times.

 

Euro-MP Gerard Batten, UKIP’s home affairs spokesman, said: “It bears out the public perception that our open door immigration policy doesn’t just attract decent migrants but serious and dangerous criminals.”

 

A UK Border Agency spokesman said last night: “We will always seek to deport any foreign criminals — and in 2011 we removed over 4,500 foreign national offenders.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Why the Progeny of Slaves Will Strike Gold at the Olympics

Wednesday, July 4th, 2012

Could the world-beating sprinting prowess of Jamaican athlete Usain Bolt really be down to his West African ancestors’ horrific ordeals at the hands of British slave traders and plantation owners?

Jamaican athletes have certainly made a speciality of dominating sprint races in recent years. At the Beijing Olympics in 2008, they won the men and women’s 100m finals, the men and women’s 200m finals—and the men won the 4 x 100m relay. Quite something for an island with a population smaller than Wales.

That supremacy is likely to be reinforced at the London Olympics, thanks perhaps to a new pretender, Yohan Blake, who trounced Bolt, his training partner, in the 200m final at the Jamaican Olympic trials in Kingston last week. Bolt, meanwhile, still holds the world 100m sprint record, with a breathtaking time of 9.58 seconds.

Clearly, such dominance cannot be gained without gruelling training regimes, specialised diets and expert coaching. But U.S. sprinter Michael Johnson, who is of West African descent, now believes that athletes like him have another weapon in their armoury: a unique genetic inheritance.

In a TV documentary, Johnson argues that descendants of slaves from West Africa (all Afro-Caribbean people owe their presence in the Caribbean to slavery dating from the 16th century) have a ‘superior athletic gene’. And it’s this that will put black Caribbean sprinters on the podium top spots at the London Games.

Such talk is controversial, alarmingly redolent as it is of the racial-superiority theories propounded by Nazi scientists in the Thirties and used to justify the genocide of millions of people deemed ‘genetically inferior’.

Johnson, however, is unabashed: ‘It is a taboo subject in the States, but it is what it is,’ he says. ‘Why shouldn’t we discuss it?’

Usain Bolt holds similar beliefs. The sprinter was born in Trelawny Parish, a Jamaican area that was formerly the site of several slave plantations.

Asked about his record-breaking 100m performance in 2009, he said: ‘It’s a background from slavery. The guys back in the day were so strong from physical work . . . the genes are really strong.’

The controversial theory supporting these claims goes back to 2003, when Australian scientists discovered  that a gene called ACTN3 has variants which may give performance advantage to the muscles of elite athletes.

In effect, it can give sprinters a boost because it gives extra power to muscle cells that are required for fast, forceful actions. Studies show that this ‘sprint’ version of the ACTN3 gene is more common in Jamaicans, for example, and others of West African descent than in people of European ancestry.

The theory speculates that this gene has been concentrated in these athletes because their ancestors journeyed from captivity in West Africa to slavery in the Caribbean under brutal conditions.

Only the toughest survived. During one such voyage in 1732, more than 95 per cent of slaves perished—170 were herded on to the ship and only six got off alive.

Cruelty on board those ships could compound the effects of disease, insanitary conditions and overcrowding. One notorious case involved the British-owned slave-ship Zong, which lost its bearings while bound for Jamaica in 1782.

After three months, 60 of the 440 slaves on board had already died. Captain Luke Collingwood’s human cargo was perishing and his hopes of profit were being replaced by fears of bankruptcy.

So he decided to pull an insurance scam, and ordered his crew to throw 132 of the weaker slaves overboard to drown.

He told insurers that he had been forced to do it because of dwindling water supplies.

The captain would have succeeded, but for the whistleblowing conscience of the chief mate, James Kelsal, who revealed that there were still 420 gallons of water on board when they had docked at Black River Port in Jamaica a month later.

The ship’s owners were taken to court in London—for insurance fraud rather than murder. No officers or crew were charged over the deliberate killings.

Clearly, those few slaves who survived the crossings were made of extremely tough stuff. For them to survive long enough subsequently to have children involved them being resilient enough to withstand life in slavery on plantations.

Towards the end of the 1700s, another factor came into play: selective breeding.

In this period, the price of imported slaves to Jamaica was rising rapidly, and there was increasing talk of abolishing the barbarous practice of slave-shipping.

Plantation owners began to believe that their most economical answer was to raise their own slaves. They went about it with characteristic inhumanity, breeding the toughest slaves for strength and treating their charges as though they were breeding cattle.

One Jamaican plantation inventory from 1790 listed 408 slaves by occupation, such as cooks, watchmen and field workers. But the largest group listed 62 women who were ‘kept for breeding’. These were called ‘breeding wenches’ or ‘belly women’.

Where possible, parents were selected for their strength.

Around the same time, a white Jamaican sugar plantation owner’s wife, A. C. Carmichael, wrote a pamphlet on breeding one’s own slaves. It recommended separating babies early from their mothers, so freeing the women for menial labour while their children were raised by women too old to work on the fields.

The children were to be integrated into the workforce virtually as soon as they could walk—to do any light tasks around the plantation they were thought capable of performing. Such conditions would, understandably, work in favour of a physically stronger population.

It has led Jamaican scientists to propound the theory that Caribbean sprinters are athletically special because those tough enough to survive these awful rigours must have had genes which made them unusually resilient.

William Aiken, a Jamaican sports doctor, believes the fact that Jamaicans excel at sprinting is a legacy of being descended from the ‘fittest of the fit slaves’.

But can it all come down to something as basic as a variation of one gene—ACTN3?

While many commentators are happy to suggest it does, one of the scientists involved in originally discovering this gene’s powers is far more sceptical.

Daniel MacArthur, a researcher at the Institute for Neuromuscular Research at Sydney University, was part of the team that found how the ACTN3 gene helps stimulate the muscle cells which are needed for generating rapid, forceful contraction in activities such as sprinting.

His studies show that the ‘sprint’ version of ACTN3 is, indeed, more common in Jamaicans—98 per cent of black Jamaicans have at least one copy, compared with 82 per cent in individuals of European ancestry. Yet he believes it plays only a ‘pretty small’ role in Jamaican sprinters’ success.

In the journal Genetic Future, he writes: ‘It is almost certainly true that Usain Bolt carries at least one “sprint” variant of the ACTN3 gene, but then so do I (along with around five billion other humans worldwide). But that doesn’t mean you’ll see me in the 100m final in London. Unfortunately for me, it takes a lot more than one lucky gene to create an Olympian.’

For success at the Olympic games, MacArthur believes there are going to be many other factors—cultural, social and economic—also at play. Indeed, Jamaican experts believe in this ‘combination’ theory of success.

For example, Dr Errol Morrison, an endocrinologist and the president of Jamaica’s University of Technology, says that diet may play a crucial role—particularly the staples of salt fish, yams and bananas which are rich in protein, carbohydrate and vital sources of  energy.

Dr Morrison says Jamaican youngsters grow up on a diet that is so beneficial they might as well take a daily dose of steroids. And such nutrition may well boost any genetic advantage that Jamaican athletes are born with, he says.

But there is surely something else at play, too—the national will to win.

The short-term explanation for Jamaica’s success is that the country took the decision to pour its resources in recent years into getting better at its most winnable events. And in its case, these events are the sprints.

The same has happened with Team GB concentrating on cycling, and its remarkable subsequent success with stars such as Sir Chris Hoy and Victoria Pendleton. So while the ACTN3 gene may play some contributory role in the wider recipe for Jamaican success, would anyone seriously suggest there is a single British gene for riding bicycles quickly?

Instead, we are only at the beginning of scientifically beginning to unravel the complex tapestry of factors which give Jamaican athletes the capability of beating the best of the rest of the world at sprinting.

Some of these factors will undoubtedly be due to powerful elements in Jamaica’s modern culture, such as diet and a deep sporting passion—but also, somewhere in a wide variety of genes, there will be the bigger story of a cruel past.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

2 terror suspects arrested in London

Friday, June 29th, 2012

London police have detained two British Muslim converts on suspicion of terror offenses Thursday, a U.K. security official told The Associated Press.

The official, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said it wasn’t clear whether the arrests were related to the upcoming Olympic Games. Security is tight ahead of the London games, which begin on July 27.

“This doesn’t appear to be a big investigation, but it’s still early days,’’ he said, downplaying the importance of the arrests.

Scotland Yard identified the men as an 18-year-old and a 32-year-old, but didn’t give their names. The force said in a statement the pair was arrested early Thursday at separate addresses in east London.

A man who identified himself as a friend of the detainees identified the 18-year-old as Jamal ud-Din and said the older man was someone he knew only as “Zakariya.’’

Mizanur Rahman, 29, said the arrests “might have had something to do with the fact that they recently went canoeing’’ on the River Lee, a branch of which runs through the Olympic site in east London. He said the pair also recently went shooting with an air rifle in Essex, a largely suburban and rural county east of London.

Rahman said he saw nothing amiss with the activities. “It’s just people trying to get into the Olympic spirit,’’ he said, adding that he believed authorities would try “painting it as jihad training.’’

Rahman pointed the AP to what he said was a photograph of ud-Din. The picture showed a stocky, pale-faced man with a bushy red beard and it appeared to match a man who appeared last year in a YouTube video entitled “The Test of Allah by Jamal ud Deen.’’

The speaker on the video, who Rahman confirmed was ud-Din, expresses contempt for democracy and non-Muslims, admiration for Islamist firebrands including jailed Egyptian preacher Abu Hamza, and anger at the Danish cartoons which infamously caricatured Muhammad — whom Muslims revere as a prophet.

At one point the speaker approvingly quotes someone he refers to only as “the sheikh.’’

“We’re not like the Christians; if you slap us on the left cheek, we’ll slap you back,’’ he tells an unseen audience. “This is so true, brother. We’re Muslims. We defend ourselves, brother.’’

Security services across Europe have long been alert to the activities of extremist Muslim converts.

Richard Reid, who tried to blow up a trans-Atlantic flight in 2001, was a convert. So, too, was Jermaine Lindsay, one of four suicide bombers in London’s 2005 attacks. The coordinated bombings killed 52 people — just one day after London won the bid for the Olympics. In 2010, two German converts to Islam and two Turkish men were convicted over a foiled plot to attack U.S. targets in Germany.

This week European security officials told the AP that they were tracking a Norwegian Muslim convert who had gone to Yemen for training and had since become “operational.’’

Intelligence officials say there has been an expected increase in chatter among extremist groups, but there are still no specific or credible threats targeting the Olympics. The terror level is labeled substantial, a notch below severe.

A substantial threat level indicates that an attack is a strong possibility.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Suspected illegal immigrants arrested at Melksham lorry depot

Thursday, June 7th, 2012

Six suspected illegal immigrants were arrested after being found in the back of a lorry in Melksham at the weekend.

Police were called to the Great Bear Distribution depot in Portal Road at 10.48am on Saturday after workers heard voices in the back of a Spanish-registered lorry which had entered the UK at Dover having crossed by ferry from Calais.

Sgt Jim Suter of Wiltshire Police attended and said: “We got a call from the depot as they had heard voices in the trailer, it was one of these lorries with a trailer attached to it at the back.

“We opened it up and saw six faces poking out of the lorry. Anyone who has entered the UK from outside the EU on the back of a lorry is someone who has probably entered illegally, so they were taken to the nearest police station and the UK Border Agency was contacted to deal with them from there.

“The annoying thing for the lorry driver and Great Bear is that the goods in the back of the lorry, cereal, have to be destroyed because there is a risk of contamination.”

Five males and one female, believed to be from Sudan, Ethiopa and Eritrea, were arrested on suspicion of immigration offences and taken to Melksham Police Station where they were questioned by members of The UK Border Agency on Saturday afternoon.

Two men from Sudan and a man from Eritrea have been transferred to immigration detention centres in Oxfordshire and London where they remain while their cases are examined.

If they are found to have no right to be in the UK they will face deportation.

The other three people arrested were found to be minors and have been released to the care of social services.

A UK Border Agency spokesman said: “When suspected illegal immigrants found on lorries are arrested by police, our officers attend quickly.

“We work closely with police to tackle illegal immigration and immigration crime. When someone is found to have no legal right to remain in the UK we take action to remove them.”

A spokesman for Cereal Partners UK, which owns the depot, said: “We are co-operating with the authorities fully. As this is an ongoing investigation, it would be inappropriate to comment further.”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share