Posts Tagged ‘History’

HUNDREDS TURN OUT TO SEE FURNESS VIKING COLLECTION

Friday, March 15th, 2013

The “Stone Age, Blood Axe, Conquest” gallery – which houses the precious Furness Viking hoard – opened to the public on Saturday.

The 92-piece collection, which includes fragile coins, ingots and bracelets, was discovered under a rock by a metal detectorist near Stainton quarry in 2011.

A community fundraising campaign raised not only the £49,500 needed to purchase the treasure from the Crown, but enough to build the gallery in which it is now displayed.

Walney residents Dennis and Wendy Currie popped in for their first look at the collection and were suitably impressed.

They predicted it would be very popular with the Danish residents working on the windfarms off Walney. Mrs Currie said: “It’s very good. I think it will be a tourist attraction and it’s great that it was able to remain in Furness.”

Re-enactment group the Herlid Vikings, which helped raise a substantial amount of money towards establishing the gallery, was again present to thrill children with their exploits.

Terry Harvey-Chadwick – aka Bjarni Thorvaldrson – said he was delighted to be able help keep the hoard in Furness for locals and visitors alike to enjoy.

“It looks really nice,” he said. “The Viking hoard is of huge historical significance and it’s a real bonus to have it displayed here.”

Eleven-year-old Marcia Dougan, of Barrow, was just one of dozens of youngsters to turn out to watch the Herlid Vikings in battle.

“It was pretty scary,” she said.

http://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/hundreds-turn-out-to-see-furness-viking-collection-1.1034323?referrerPath=news/#.URlg-vABLUY.twitter

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Surviving Material Evidence

Wednesday, September 5th, 2012

Evidence for the use of runes after 597 is generally preserved in one of three forms: inscriptions, coins, and manuscripts. Runic inscriptions on monuments, often found in combination with Roman letters, are especially useful for studying regional variations in the use and structure of the futhorcInscriptions on portable objects also bear runic inscriptions, but the limitation of the surviving sample to non-perishable artefacts may obscure some of the more mundane vernacular uses of runes, as well as important evidence regarding the runic literacy of the general population

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Obama The Moron

Monday, July 30th, 2012

 

Obama

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Nazi Propaganda in the 1930′s/40′s

Thursday, June 14th, 2012

Nazi Propaganda in the 1930′s/40′s

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

How I Treat a Speaker by Heringsblatt

Thursday, May 17th, 2012

The speaker is a creature who knows everything. It is, therefore, unnecessary to meet him at the train station, since he will surely find the way to my house on his own. I live in a suburb outside town, so the two-and-a-half-hour walk will do him good. Speaking is a healthy occupation, after all; they are in good shape. When the speaker arrives at my front door, I’ll still be at the office. Unless my wife is doing something else, she’ll be at home. If she isn’t home, the speaker can certainly find something to do for a while. We have a nice museum, for example, as well as the old Swedish fortifications. If my wife happens to be at home (though why should one assume she would be?), the process is as follows. My wife will bring him to the kitchen. Why should the poor man sit alone in his room and be bored? Neither my wife nor I want that. First my wife, then I, will tell him all our political opinions. We can talk about such matters better than anyone. That’s a good way to start. Then we take out all the old family pictures. This is so exciting that he will scarcely notice the noise of my four children, but rather despite the weariness caused by his long train ride (which isn’t all that bad), he’ll be able to listen attentively to my flow of words. After all, I want to be a speaker too some day. The speaker will see that I am already gifted.

After we have eaten, we go to the meeting. It’s best to go on foot; a little rain doesn’t matter. The meeting begins. My introduction should be as long as possible, since one must become known, after all. It’s a pleasure to hear oneself talk. Then I introduce the speaker, and explain that he will now speak. After the speech, I make sure as many people as possible have a chance to talk to him. I’ve noticed that speakers just beam with joy when lots of people want to talk with them after a speech. If the party propaganda central office has banned discussion periods after speeches, I hold one anyway. People want that in my area, and besides I thereby fight the slogan of the SPD [Socialists]: “The masses will win.”

There are always a lot of people standing around the speaker after the meeting. That’s time time to ask the speaker “How much should I pay you?” Of course, I know that it is uncomfortable for the speaker to ask for an honorarium. He will likely say “the cost of my train ticket, Mr. Heringsblatt.” After all, one has to know to keep one’s local group treasury full. I then pay the speaker what he asks for in coins. That way, everyone knows and hears what he is getting. Why shouldn’t everyone know? Mostly I give the speaker only the return fare or even half of that — he can, I assume, walk the rest of the way!

“You tell me, my friend, that this speaker has over 2000 marks in political fines to pay? Well, I never knowingly engage such a speaker. And please don’t tell anyone, since we surely don’t have the money to help him out!”

After we talk until 3 a.m. in the morning, we head home. You know that I live in the outskirts of the city. Someone takes a shot at us on the way home. My, what times we live in! The speaker sleeps on the sofa in the living room. Party member Knorpel wanted to get him a hotel room with a proper bed, but I want to be sure the speaker has the honor of sleeping on the local group leaders’s sofa. We talk for another hour. Since I have to be up at six, I wake the speaker at 5 to give him the opportunity to bid me farewell. As we part, I encourage him to ask my Gauleiter [the regional party leader] for the part of the honorarium I didn’t pay. My Gauleiter is happy to make up the difference.

Now you know why my local group never has any financial problems.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Panzer III

Monday, May 14th, 2012

A medium tank (22 tons) with a crew of five, the main German tank in 1940-1942. Initially it had a 37mm gun (and two machine guns), but was planned for future use of bigger guns. It participated in small numbers in the invasion of Poland, but mass production began after the beginning of World War 2, with a 50mm gun . Since the new gun was too weak against Russian T-34 tanks, a more powerful 50mm gun was installed. Later types had an even bigger 75mm gun, same as that of the Panzer IV, with 64 rounds. Production ended in mid 1943, but production of a self-propelled gun version continued until the end of the war. There were also a command tank version and other versions. A total of 15,000 were produced.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

A test of fate

Saturday, May 12th, 2012

One may use examples from history, e.g., the Roman battle against Hannibal, drawing the conclusion that we think we are just as hard as the Romans who in the end defeated Hannibal, despite his early victories. Each people will face trials during this gigantic battle. It is “a little question of fate as to whether the faith and confidence of our people is strong enough, or whether it will fail as it did in 1918!

That fact that this meeting room is so packed is proof that the German people has already passed this test. Sacrifices have to be made in this struggle. If someone loses his nerve, that has no impact on the efforts of the whole people. A company must continue the attack even if its captain falls; someone else must take over leadership. A factory, too, does not stop working if the director falls.

A people’s comrade should remember that fate during such a war tests not only the average person, but also men in high and the highest positions.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

THORAK, JOSEF

Friday, May 11th, 2012

(1889-1952). Said to have been Hitler‘s favorite sculptor. He specialized in heroic male figures and creating colossal sculptures. Acquitted of all crimes during denazification.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

SCHAUB, JULIUS

Tuesday, May 8th, 2012

(1898-unknown) Hitler‘s close companion and driver from 1922. Later Hitler’s personal aide with rank of SS lieutenant general. Said to have personally destroyed Hitler’s secret files in 1945.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

England and International Law

Saturday, May 5th, 2012

A fundamental principle of international law that all civilized nations have solemnly affirmed is that wars are fought between armed forces, and that defenseless civilians, above all women and children, should be safe from enemy action.

Great Britain’s policy has always been to affirm the slogans of international law and humanity at every opportunity — but to trample on them whenever necessary. The world is well aware of the terrible brutality with which the British so often in their history have acted against innocent women and children. Every German remembers the hunger blockade the British conducted against the German civilian population during the World War of 1914-1918, mocking international law.

Every new weapon humanity invents brings new possibilities for misuse. That is particularly true for the air force. It stretches the arm of the fighting forces far beyond the front into the enemy’s peaceful hinterland, reaching them with death-dealing weapons. We Germans who lived along the border during the World War 1914-1918 already had a bitter taste of that.

In the years following the World War — at least in enemy countries — there was a dynamic development of long range bombers that led to their present form. Voices calling for humanitarian limitations of aerial warfare were not silent. The British above all made fine-sounding statements about humanitarian restrictions. But only Adolf Hitler made really practical suggestions for disarmament and for more humanitarian warfare. His proposals were always ignored.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share