Archive for April, 2012

Temple unites against Islamophobia

Monday, April 30th, 2012

100 Temple students and their allies united in protest against the “Islamic Apartheid Conference” hosted by the Temple University Students for Intellectual Freedom (TUSIF). The event was sponsored by the right-wing David Horowitz Freedom Center and featured notorious Islamophobes Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer.

The stated mission of TUSIF is to fight for human rights and combat the “intellectual intolerance” they claim is rampant among leftist and Islamic “extremists.” While TUSIF has in the past hosted events scapegoating the poor, this event was aimed at demonizing Islam as a faith that supposedly engages in“Islamic apartheid” and “Islamization”–what the David Horowitz Freedom Center defines as the violent replacement of a country’s or region’s customs, norms and laws with Islamic sentiment.

All the panelists were self-proclaimed anti-Muslim spokespeople, prompting outrage among Temple students. Pamela Geller is the director of Stop Islamization of America (SIOA). Robert Spencer is the founder of Jihad Watch, an anti-Muslim website that demonizes Islam as a religion of terrorism.

Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian white supremacist who went on a murder rampage last summer, praised both Geller and Spencer in his manifesto published online.

The response protest was organized by Temple students in less than a week and was endorsed by over 15 organizations across the city, including the International Socialist Organization, Muslims for Progressive Values, Occupy Philly, One People’s Project, Philadelphia International Action Center, Student Labor Action Project, Students for Justice in Palestine and the Temple College Democrats.

Protesters chanted, “Hate speech is not free speech!” and “Sexists, bigots, antigay; right-wing bigots go away!” while waiting to enter the event. Inside, debate broke out in response to Horowitz’s speech. One man stood to point out a mistake in Horowitz’s racist analysis of Islam.

Soon after, the protesters stood in silence, holding signs with phrases such as “Ignorance is the enemy, not Islam”–and then walked out of the auditorium. A rally with speeches was then held outside.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

TEMPLE STUDENTS have organized in protest of Islamophobic events in the past. In 2010, a group of around 50 activists protested Geller and Spencer speaking on Temple’s campus for a similar event.

However, this recent protest showed clear growth in the anti-Islamophobia and anti-racism movements. The movement has not only grown in numbers and support, but also in its political critique. In 2010, the Muslim Student Association (MSA) chose not to participate in order to stay politically neutral. On Monday, MSA board members were front and center, leading the struggle against racism.

In the wake of Trayvon Martin and Shaima Alawadi solidarity protests, protesters at Temple connected the struggle against Islamophobia to the struggles of Black Americans, Arab Spring revolutionaries and Occupiers all over the world.

A Christian minister gave an impromptu speech, saying:

I am astounded that Arab Spring is not recognized by the folks inside here as a democratic movement that has inspired the whole world. And Occupy is just one expression that we owe to our Muslim brothers and sisters who fought much greater fights than us. We can take courage from our Muslim brothers and sisters, and go on and fight as courageously as they have to overthrow the kinds of powers that they have shown that people together can do.

A member of Students for Justice in Palestine and Occupy Temple said:

While [the Islamophobes] are a small group, the ideas that they advocate are not marginal. In fact, the ideas that [TUSIF] advocates [are ones] the U.S. government relies on to carry out imperialism abroad and economic oppression at home…and at home when they cut our funding for schools, health care, and education.

They hope that we will be divided and unable to present a united fightback against their oppression and exploitation. What we did with this demonstration is show them that we won’t be fooled. We are going to organize and fight back, and any time these bigots have an event, we will have a massive response.

Protesters voiced a real feeling of progress and hope during the action. The growth of the movement against Islamophobia in the past year and the centrality of solidarity within the critique of all current movements against racism are inspiring.

One Muslim Student Association board member told the crowd, “Enough is enough. Today will not be known in cyberspace as the day Temple hosted a known hate group and a panel of xenophobes. Today will be known as the day Temple students united…and put a stop to the ignorance being spread at our university.”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Christians Crucified in the Communist Holocaust Killed Tens of Millions of People!

Monday, April 30th, 2012

A Russian presidential commission said Monday that 200,000 clergy were systematically murdered under Soviet rule in a horrific cycle of crucifixions, scalpings and “bestial tortures.” Commission chairman Alexander Yakovlev, presenting the report at a news conference, seemed unconcerned that it might deter electors from voting communist or nationalist in parliamentary elections on Dec. 17. “If it has an influence, I will be very satisfied,” he said. The report by the Commission for the Rehabilitation of the Victims of Political Repression also found that another 500,000 religious figures suffered persecution in the decades after Vladimir Lenin‘s [Jewish] Bolsheviks seized power. “Documents relate how clergymen, monks, nuns were crucified on royal gates and shot in the basements of the Cheka (secret police), scalped, strangled, drowned and submitted to other bestial tortures,” he said. Yakovlev said some of the material, from archives of the former ruling politburo and security services, had not been previously published and that uncovering it was traumatic. “I was especially shocked by accounts of priests turned into columns of ice in winter… But that’s not all, there were crucifixions … It was total cruelty.” He said hundreds of people were shot for not giving up church property, and only a fraction of the proceeds were spent on the poor as the authorities had promised.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

The Younger Futhark

Monday, April 30th, 2012

The Younger Fuþark (Danish variation)
In Scandinavia, the Elder Futhark remained in use until some time around the eighth century (the time of the Eddas), when drastic changes in the Old Norse language occurred, and corresponding changes in the runic alphabet were made to accommodate the new sounds. However, unlike the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc, the Younger Futhark (as it is now called) reduced the number of runes from 24 to 16, and several runes came to represent multiple sounds. The forms of the runes were also changed and simplified. There are several variations of this futhark – Danish, long branch, Norwegian, dotted, etc.

This form of the runic alphabet spread from Denmark north into Sweden and Norway, and was carried into Iceland and Greenland by the Vikings. It is possible that they were also brought to North America with the Vinland expeditions, but so far no authenticated inscriptions have been found.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

The Anglo-Saxon Futhorc

Monday, April 30th, 2012

Sometime around the fifth century AD, changes occurred in the runes in Frisia (the area around the northern Netherlands and north-western Germany). This period coincided with the Anglo-Saxon invasions from this area and the appearance of similar runes in the British Isles. The forms of several of the runes changed, notably the runes for A/O, C/K, H, J, S, and Ng. Also, changes in the language led to between five and nine runes being added to the alphabet to compensate for the extra sounds, and several runes were given different corresponding letters. This alphabet has become known as the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Austin neo-Nazi faces federal charges

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

Two Minnesota men, including one from Austin, with suspected ties to white supremacist groups amassed several weapons and hundreds of rounds of ammunition as part of a plan to attack the government, minorities and others, according to a federal affidavit unsealed this week.

Samuel James Johnson, 31, of Austin, also tried to recruit others to his cause and actively scouted for a training compound in Illinois and Minnesota, the affidavit said. Joseph Benjamin Thomas, 42, of Mendota Heights, told an undercover FBI agent that he had tried to get explosives as part of a plan to “conduct attacks on left-wing individuals,” according to the affidavit.

Authorities began looking into Johnson and Thomas in 2010, as part of an investigation into domestic terrorism.

However, the men have not been charged with terrorism.

Johnson was indicted earlier this month on multiple felony charges for an armed career criminal in possession of firearms and ammunition, and Thomas was indicted on drug charges. Court documents were unsealed this week after the men made their initial appearances in U.S. District Court. According to court records, Johnson was ordered to be held in jail.

The indictments said Johnson has prior convictions for armed crimes and is not allowed to have weapons, but from late 2010 through late last year he was found with five weapons — including a semi-automatic assault rifle — and over 1,000 rounds of ammunition.

Thomas was indicted on four charges related to possession and sale of methamphetamine.

Messages left with their attorneys, Douglas Olson and Nancy Vanderheider, were not returned on Friday.

According to the affidavit, Johnson was a former member and Minnesota leader of the National Socialist Movement, a white nationalist group and had gone on to form his own group, called the Aryan Liberation Movement.

With the new group, Johnson planned to “recruit and train other white supremacist sympathizers toward a final goal of committing acts of violence against the United States government and minority individuals,” the affidavit said.

Thomas came to the FBI’s attention when he hosted National Socialist Movement meetings in 2010 and discussed forming the new group with Johnson, the affidavit said. Johnson conducted several rallies in Austin in 2009 that prompted protest from several dozen people who also threw tomatoes in response.

Johnson was convicted of numerous felonies in Mower County in November 2007, including simple robbery, second-degree assault with a dangerous weapon, two felony drug charges for controlled substance, third- and fifth-degree drug sale and possession of machine guns and short-barreled shotguns.

Thomas has prior convictions and is prohibited from having firearms until 2013. However, last May he sold an undercover FBI agent several weapons, including a semi-automatic handgun, a pistol-grip shotgun, a laser sight and hundreds of rounds of ammunition, according to the affidavit.

A month later, Thomas told the undercover agent that Homeland Security agents came to his home. Thomas said he lied to those officials and destroyed his computer hard drive after they left. Thomas then gave the undercover FBI agent more ammunition, a handgun, another laser sight, and a ballistic vest, explaining that he feared he would be arrested for having the weapons, the affidavit said.

He also showed the undercover agent a shotgun he kept in his closet, according to the affidavit.

This month, Thomas told the undercover agent that a stockpile of guns had been stolen in northern Minnesota, and while some had been returned to authorities, two of the stolen guns were at his house, the affidavit said.

The affidavit also outlined Thomas’ suspected drug activity. He allegedly told the undercover agent in January that he believed once the increased law enforcement activity around his home died down, he would control the area’s marijuana, cocaine and meth connections.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

MAJOR ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, in Fecp and the Minority Machine, page 10

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

B’nai B’rith, the secret Jewish fraternity, was organized in 1843, awakening world Jewish aspirations, or Zionism, and its name, meaning “Sons of the Covenant,” suggests that the 12 men who organized the fraternity aimed at bringing about the fulfillment of “the Covenant,” or the supposed Messianic promise of rulership over all peoples. To rule all peoples, it is first necessary to bring them together in a world federation or world government – which is the avowed aim of both Communists and Zionists.”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

MRS. CLARE SHERIDAN, Traveler, Lecturer in NEW YORK WORLD, December 15, 1923

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

“The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every government office, bureau and newspaper. They are driving out the Russians and are responsible for the anti-Semitic feeling which is increasing.”

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Hans Scholl

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

Hans Scholl is remembered for his part in the White Rose movement. A founder member of the movement, Hans beleived that a student uprising would lead to the downfall of the Nazi regime. Hans possibly underestimated the extent of the grip the state had on the people of Germany. Hans was caught, tried and executed.  

 

 

Hans Scholl was born on September 22nd 1918. Unlike his sister, Sophie, Hans could be very outspoken and impulsive but he was also a determined boy who could be moody on occasions. Hans had a great knowledge of the Bible, which he read avidly. 

 

 

He joined the Hitler Youth movement in March 1933 and threw himself into it with great gusto. Hans excelled at most opportunities offered by the Hitler Youth movement and in a short space of time was promoted to Squad Leader in charge of 150 boys. In particular, Hans excelled at sport and he was put in charge of the physical training programme for new recruits. It was also his task to ensure that all those in his squad listened to Hitler Youth radio addresses that went out each week.

 

 

In November 1933, Hans was ordered by senior Hitler Youth leaders in Ulm to start an elite ‘A Squad’. These leaders believed that male Hitler Youth members in Ulm had not fully taken on board the “ideological mission” of true service to Hitler. They wanted Hans to create a blueprint for how all Ulm Hitler Youth units should be. Hans was encouraged to look at the way the German Boys League of the First of November 1929 youth group operated. This group was more commonly known as ‘d.j.1.11’. Eberhard Köbel had created it. He was a communist and had been imprisoned in Dachau once the Nazis had gained power. Members of d.j.1.11 could be described as young bohemians as free thought was encouraged, as was “degenerate art” as practiced by the Bauhaus movement. They went camping but not in the traditional areas of Germany such as Bavaria and the Rhineland. Sweden and Finland were popular destinations. A great emphasis was put on reading Russian literature and most members tried to learn to play the balalaika, a Russia instrument.

 

 

It was a curious group for Hans to be told to examine as it seemed to be diametrically the opposite of everything the Hitler Youth stood for. However, he did as he was ordered and was very taken by what the d.j.1.11 stood for, especially their independent way of thinking. Hans brought such beliefs into his elite ‘A Squad’. However, it also brought him into conflict with the very people who had originally ordered him to look at the way the d.j.1.11 worked. In 1935 the ‘A Squad’ was disbanded – something that greatly angered Hans. However, it continued to meet in secret. The Ulm Hitler Youth authorities got to know of this and Hans was stripped of his squad leader status. The rank was only restored once he made a full promise that the group would never meet again. To further encourage Hans, he was selected to carry a flag representing the Ulm Hitler Youth at the 1935 Nuremberg Rally. His friends recalled that he left Ulm train station on a special party train in high spirits. But he came back from the ‘Rally of Freedom’ greatly demoralised. He had seen the drunken and rowdy behaviour of Nazi supporters at Nuremberg and such behaviour left him cold. His sister Inge noticed a major change in him on his return from Nuremberg.    

 

Hans continued in the Hitler Youth. However, it was something that occurred while he served in the HY that may well have turned both him and Sophie against the Nazi regime. The Criminal Code of Germany covered homosexual crimes in Paragraph 175. The Nazis included an addendum that was known as Paragraph 176. This made it a criminal offence for any senior officer in the Hitler Youth and the DBM to use their position to gain sexual favours from those under their command. In 1937 Hans was accused of such an offence and was arrested by theGestapo. Not only was Hans arrested but also some of his brothers and sisters. After what must have seemed like a long period of time, Hans was brought before a court. Here his family’s ‘national comrade’ status played to his advantage. Hans had previously admitted his guilt to the charge but the age of “X”, the other youth in the case, proved to be crucial – “X” was nearly as old as Hans and he admitted in court that he had been a willing participant. The court believed that Paragraph 176 had been introduced to help minors but that this was not relevant in this case as both of the youths involved were nearly of the same age. Hans was found not guilty and was told that he could leave the court with his head held high – despite the fact that he had admitted the charge. There can be little doubt, however, that the whole episode had done a great deal to hurt the family. Sophie claimed that she had been abused at BDM meetings simply because she was the brother of Hans. The siblings that survived World War Two later claimed that their father had declared that he would go to Berlin and personally shoot Hitler if Hans had been found guilty.       

 

 

Hans had set his heart on studying medicine at university. To attend university under Hitler’s regime, you had to have gained your ‘Abitur’ and to have undertaken some form of service to the state – for young men that meant time in the military or in theRAD (National Labour Service). Hans chose the RAD and from the spring of 1937 he worked on the autobahns that were being built across Germany. As a member of RAD, he could no longer be a member of the Hitler Youth movement.

 

 

Having done his service in RAD, Hans attended university in Munich to study medicine. Some of the young people he met at the Ludwig-Maximillian University were to become the heart of the White Rose movement. Some of the young men he met had served on the Eastern Front and had witnessed the massacre of civilians and other atrocities. Stories such as these only hardened Hans’ resolve to do something that would hit the regime. He and the other members decided on a very high risk strategy. They decided that they would print leaflets that explained their beliefs and views and leave them around the university for others to pick up. In view of the number of informers that existed throughout all institutions in Nazi Germany and the extent they had infiltrated all aspects of life, it was only a matter of time before they were caught. In fact, Hans and the others initially led lucky lives as they managed to write and print off five anti-war leaflets and leave them throughout the university. The sixth and final leaflet called ‘To fellow freedom fighters in the resistance’ was also printed but it was in the very moment of leaving the leaflets around that both Hans and his sister Sophie were caught by a worker at the university.

 

 

Sophie and Hans took a bundle of this printed leaflet to the university on February 18th 1943 where both of them distributed what they could before attending a lecture.

 

 

However, they did not have time to leave them all before their lecture started. After they left their lecture they made the fatal decision to leave the rest of the leaflets at the university as they were convinced that students would be very important in any uprising against Hitler. They decided not to waste the leaflets as a great deal of time had been put into illegally printing them. Hans and Sophie went to the university’s atrium where they left the remaining leaflets. But while doing this they were seen by a caretaker called Jacob Schmid. He called the Gestapo and held Sophie and Hans until the secret police arrived. Their fate was sealed as the Gestapo had all the evidence they needed actually in the university.

 

 

Just four days later Hans was brought before the People’s Court where the sitting judge was the notorious Roland Freisler. Hans admitted his full responsibility in an attempt to end any form of interrogation that might result in him revealing other members of the movement. However, the Gestapo refused to believe that only two people were involved and after further interrogation, they gained the names of all those involved who were subsequently arrested.

 

 

Hans and Sophie, along with a fellow member of the White Rose movement, Christopher Probst were the first to be brought before the People’s Court on February 22nd 1943. The People’s Court had been established on April 24th 1934 to try cases that were deemed to be political offences against the Nazi state. Invariably these trials were nothing more than show trials designed to humiliate those brought before it, presumably in the hope that such a public humiliation would put off anyone else whom might be thinking in the same way as the condemned. All three were found guilty and sentenced to death. Hans, along with Sophie and Christopher, was taken from the court room to the place of execution at Munich’s Stadelheim Prison. His execution took place just hours after the guilty verdict was announced. His last words were “Long live freedom”.  

 

 

However, his legacy remained as a copy of ‘To fellow freedom fighters in the resistance’ was smuggled out of Germany and printed en masse in England. Re-titled ‘The manifesto of the students of Munich’, millions of copies were dropped throughout Nazi Germany by Bomber Command and the USAAF. 


Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Gustav Krupp

Saturday, April 28th, 2012

Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach became an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler after he became Chancellor in January 1933. Krupp made generous donations to the Nazi Party but the company he headed also made vast sums of money out of the Nazi rearmament plan.

 

Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach was born Gustav von Bohlen und Halbach in The Hague on August 7th 1870. He was born into a successful banking family and consequently Krupp had a comfortable childhood. After leaving school, he went to Heidelberg University where he studied law. After university, Krupp joined the German Diplomatic Corps and served in Washington DC, Peking and the Vatican. In 1906 he married the twenty years old Bertha Krupp. Wilhelm II allowed him to add the prestigious surname Krupp to his own as opposed to it being ‘lost’ when he married Bertha. Krupp spent the rest of his working life directing the very successful Krupp Works and only left the company in 1941. His son Alfred took over the helm in 1943. The company made a fortune out of World War One andWorld War Two. In World War One the company not only made munitions for the German Army – where it had a virtual monopoly – but it also used its shipyards at Kiel to make U-boats that were to become a major factor in the war.

 

Krupp was an ardent nationalist and greatly opposed the Treaty of Versailles. There were probably two reasons for this: the first was that Krupp considered the treaty humiliating and a disgrace to Germany. The second was more about business: the treaty greatly reduced Germany’s military might and therefore there was much less call for the government to purchase Krupp merchandise. The company had to lay off workers and readjust its business ventures. On the surface, Krupp’s turned towards producing agricultural equipment. However, it also covertly kept up on military development by setting up factories abroad that did not come under the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. Hence artillery was developed and factories based in Sweden while submarine development continued in the Netherlands. While the new military might of Nazi Germany seemed to suddenly appear, it had in fact been developed throughout the 1920’s but away from the eyes of France, USA and Great Britain. In fact, Krupp was doing nothing illegal even if the company’s plans did sidestep the Treaty of Versailles. Ironically some of this development was funded by the British as the British company Vickers used a Krupp’s patent in much of its weapons development and Krupp Works was paid a handsome dividend for this.

 

Krupp was an avowed monarchist. Wilhelm II had arranged for him to marry Bertha and there was a permanent suite of rooms kept for the Kaiser at the Krupp’s family estate. Initially Krupp was against the rise of the Nazi Party and Hitler. He viewed the party as a destabilising element within a nation that needed stability. When it became clear that the Nazi Party was becoming the most popular party in the Reichstag, Krupp actively used his friendship with President von Hindenburg to advise the President not to appoint Hitler Chancellor. In this he failed as on January 30th 1933, Hindenburg invited Hitler to be the new Chancellor after von Papen had been dismissed – despite Krupp’s pleas as late as January 29th.

 

Within three weeks, Krupp offered Hitler his full support and others who knew him referred to Krupp as a “super Nazi”. He later claimed that this was because Hitler stated to industrialists on February 20th 1933 that he would reject disarmament as a way ahead. Krupp Works would clearly benefit from this. Krupp also supported the planned abolition of trade unions and Hitler’s promise that the elections planned for March 1933 would be the last. At the end of the February 20th meeting Krupp rose to his feet and thanked Hitler for “having given us such a clear picture.”

 

Firms such as Krupp Works did extremely well out of it rearmament. The workforce had been tamed as those who refused to work were classed as “workshy” and sent to concentration camps for “re-education”. Trade union leaders had also been sent to the camps. Krupp Works also had a ready market. Krupp did all he could to remain a positive asset to Hitler. Krupp was already the chairman of the Adolf Hitler-Spende – a fund raised by industrialists for Nazi benefits.

 

In 1939 Krupp suffered a stroke and became more and more disabled. He remained at the head of the company until 1941 and from 1941 to 1943 he was no more than a figurehead leader. His son Alfred took over the company in 1943.

 

 In 1943, Hitler ordered that Krupp Works should become a family holding after forty years of being a public company. All the profits made by the company went to the family as opposed to former shareholders.

 

After the end of World War Two, Krupp was arrested and accused of knowingly using slave labour from concentration camps and prisoners-of-war in his industries and of complicity in Hitler’s aggression. He was due to stand trial before an American tribunal in 1948 but he was declared unfit as he was diagnosed as being senile. It was generally accepted that Krupp would not be able to understand the legal proceedings and as such would not or could not receive a fair trial. Provisions were made however to try Krupp if he showed any signs of recovery after his case was dismissed but this did not occur.

 

His son Alfred was put on trial for the same crimes. Alfred was found guilty and was sentenced to 12 years in prison along with the confiscation of all his property. He was released in 1951, his property was returned and he continued to work as the head of Krupp Works. 

 

Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach died on January 16th, 1950.


Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Judge wants to know more about Zimmerman finances

Saturday, April 28th, 2012

Calling it an “oversight,” George Zimmerman’s attorney said Friday the neighborhood watch volunteer did not disclose that a website had raised more than $200,000 for his defense, even though his family told the judge they would have trouble coming up with his bond.

“Quite honestly, with everything he is going through over the past several weeks, if that is the only oversight committed, then we’ll deal with it,” said Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara.

O’Mara claimed the family was not trying to be deceptive, but Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester said he wanted to know more about the money. O’Mara doesn’t think the judge will change Zimmerman’s bond in light of the new information.

Zimmerman was released from jail earlier this week, and has gone into hiding ever since over concerns about his safety. He is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teenager. Zimmerman wasn’t charged for more than six weeks, setting off nationwide protests. He claims self-defense.

Zimmerman’s father is white and his mother is from Peru.

An attorney for Martin’s family said the teenager’s parents were “offended” Zimmerman did not tell the judge about the money.

“This is a bombshell that was dropped,” Benjamin Crump said.

O’Mara said he learned about the money this week, after Zimmerman’s release. The family used $5,000 from the website as well as a second mortgage on their home to bail out Zimmerman, O’Mara said. Zimmerman has also used some of the money for living expenses.

Zimmerman disclosed the $200,000 when his defense attorney was closing down his social media accounts and the website earlier this week, O’Mara said.

“We just didn’t have a lot of conversations around money and the website,” O’Mara said.

The defense has started a Facebook page and Twitter account for Zimmerman, and another website under O’Mara’s control, www.gzlegalcase.com. It will allow supporters to donate to a legal defense fund.

“I don’t want my client to have any Internet presence unless it is through my office,” O’Mara said. “What I’m trying to do is limit the enormity of danger that comes into this case in places like Twitter and false Facebook accounts.”

Zimmerman’s lawyer said most donors had contributed in the range of several hundred dollars. He said he didn’t want their names publicized.

“My fear is they will be targeted for reprisals, animosities,” O’Mara said.

Also Friday, Lester refused the prosecution’s request to issue a gag order on those involved in the murder trial. He said he would not stop Zimmerman’s attorneys from talking to the media.

“This case is the most significant media event in the country, maybe in the world. We can’t be absolutely mute about these matters,” O’Mara said.

The hearing was called originally to decide whether Zimmerman’s court file should be opened to the public.

Typically, court records are public, but O’Mara had asked that they be sealed at his arraignment, and another judge agreed. Lester ruled that the court file will be open.

If prosecutors or O’Mara are worried about the release of specific items, they can present their concerns to Lester and he will rule on a case-by-case basis.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share