Archive for March, 2012

The cross of Christ and the swastika must have a positive relationship!

Saturday, March 31st, 2012

The church must affirm without reservation the German people’s community growing out of National Socialism, and at the same time must do everything it can to make up for what has been neglected or ignored in the past!

The church must affirm without reservation Adolf Hitler’s total state, the last bulwark against the Satan of Bolshevism. It should not be forgotten that, had it not been for Hitler, we would long since have sunk into Bolshevism, and probably would no longer have had churches and ministers.

The church must affirm without reservation the Führer of the National Socialists, Adolf Hitler, the Chancellor of the German Reich. He expects the church to help build the Third Reich, and has proclaimed that National Socialist German Workers’ Party, which now forms the state, wants to stand on the foundation of positive Christianity. It is the task of the church to create and provide this foundation. It is the content of the absolute affirmation that the church has to make if it really wants to be a people’s church.

We “German Christians” were firmly resolved to work to see that the church makes this affirmation clearly and unambiguously (that means without reservation). We are also firmly resolved to hold to this affirmation, and transform it into action. We will not be diverted from this by anything, including the quarreling of the opposition of today which has still not understood, or does not want to understand, and least of all by the forces of Reaction (regardless of how they may conceal themselves). National Socialists in the province should and must know:

On 28 August 1933 and 25 October 1933, the church publicly and solemnly spoke its affirmation, and is determined to hold to this affirmation and to carry it out.

28 August 1933

The 4th provincial church council opened on 28 August 1933 at the Ständehaus in Hanover. In accordance with the wishes of the “German Christians,” it began with especially festive ceremonies and took on a unique stamp through the affirmation of the National Socialist people of the church and the affirmation of the church of the National Socialist people. In other words: The opening of the provincial church council became a new experience for church members, since for the first time on 28 August 1933, publicly and solemnly, the cross of Christ and the swastika were placed next to each other in a positive way.

The church council customarily opens with a public worship service, which took place this time in the Market Church, the biggest church in Hanover. The service began at noon; long before, the big church was filled to overflowing, so that many people’s comrades could not gain admittance (proof, by the way, that the new call of the church was understood by the new Germany). On both sides of the altar were the many flags of the S.A., the H.J., the Stahlhelm, and the youth federations. Besides the members of the provincial church council, the church senate, and church offices, the whole church council of Hanover participated in the service. Many government offices had representatives. The rest of the church was packed with many hundreds of people’s comrades from the city and countryside.Swastika and Church

The church service began with the hymn “Praise the Lord, Oh My Soul” The general superintendent of the Stahlhelm led the liturgy. After the song “If God is for me, All Else May Be against Me,” Provincial Bishop D. Marahrens preached a sermon on these words of Jesus: “He who confesses me before men will I also confess before my heavenly father. He who denies me to men will I also deny before my heavenly father.” Referring to the extraordinarily large attendance at the service, the preacher asked if the joyful readiness of so many meant that that the powerful missionary urge of the church might meet a searching call of the nation in the new age. If that were to happen, it would require the efforts of many to rebuild the church in the right way. Only that rebuilding of the church with an unambiguous and clear foundation would meet the longings of our people and our fatherland. None other than Jesus Christ, the Savior who died for humanity, stands in the center of this confession. Referring to eternity and its just judgment, the sermon concluded that the church must be a “daring church”, daring in the sense that we, out of love for our people, and convinced of the truth of the Gospel, must put this complete and eternal message in support of the new age.

The organ thundered as the participants left the service and marched solemnly from the Market Church to the Ständehaus. The S.S. was at the head, followed by the S.A. band, then the banners. They were followed by the members of the church senate, the general superintendent, the representatives of government agencies, the members of the provincial church council, the members, officials, and employees of the provincial church administration the invited guests, the clergy and church officers of Hanover, the youth organizations with their banners, as well as units of the S.A. and the Stahlhelm. The bells of all the churches rang as the procession passed through Hanover’s streets. In honor of the church celebration, most buildings were decorated with the swastika flags of the National Socialist revolution. Behind the columns of the S.A. and S.S. that lined the streets, thousands of people saluted the procession with joyful shouts of “Heil!” And throughout the entire province of Hanover, bells tolled thanks and praise to the Lord God.

The Ständehaus was decorated with the church’s flags with the cross, Hitler’s swastika, and the glorious flags of black-white-red. A large crowd gathered of those who wanted to participate in the solemn ceremony. The S.A. band played the “Netherlands Hymn of Praise,” then the crowd sang “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God.” Then Provincial Bishop D. Marahrens spoke. Among other things, he said: As never before in the history of the people, the individual is bound to the whole of the people, which the Lutheran provincial church in Hanover joyfully affirms. A full and strong affirmation of its ethnicity, of the purity and path it followed, an affirmation of the Reich and its freedom and honor, an affirmation of the state it serves loyally and with devotion. As part of the German Evangelical Church, the Lutheran Provincial Church in Hanover could demonstrate great service to the people. As the church of God, it had the best that the world has, it had what a people with deep roots must have for its life, and it had what the Führer of our people had to have for his people and his work. Unrestricted in its proclamation of the Gospel and unlimited in the freedom of its witness, it gave the people and its Führer the greatest possible gift, namely a firm conscience born from the forgiveness of sins. Under the authority of the holy and omnipotent God, under which the church stands and will forever stand — if it wants to remain serious Christians — the people and Reich have true support in the authority of this God. And the state has its deepest, strongest, and —from the human standpoint — indestructible roots in the church. With this certainty, the Hanoverian provincial church affirms our state absolutely. It believes that this state is the best one possible. The Evangelical Church has always given to the state what is its due. The church gives this state and its Führer what it has, joyfully and without reservation, with a thankful heart.

After thousands had sung “Now Thank We All our God,” District President Stapenhorst spoke in the name of the Prussian government and the Prussian president. The national revolution was total, and wanted to include the whole life of the people; no part of life could remain untouched by the great events of the age. The breakthrough of the new idea of the state wanted to transform the German and his thinking, and teach each individual to sacrifice for the good of the community. The people’s community should be founded on a united religious faith. The church could not remain untouched by the storm of the national uprising. The church must understand the call of the age. Churchmen who understand their people must so transform the church’s structure so that all people’s comrades can feel at home in the church. That great goal would be achieved when one affirmed Hitler’s liberating action, and fought side by side with him for the moral and religious renewal of our people. In this sense, he extended the greetings and best wishes of the Prussian government and its president, and at the same time called for everyone to join in a triple “Sieg Heil” to Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler.

Thousands of arms reached to heaven in the Hitler greeting, and thousands of people’s comrades praised the Führer with a triple “Sieg Heil.” The same thousands spontaneously sang the Horst Wessel song. Then Pastor Hahn-Elmlohe, the leader of the “German Christians” in Hanover, spoke on behalf of the provincial church council. Like many others, he was wearing a brown shirt:

28 August 1933 will go down in the history of the Evangelical-Lutheran Church of Hanover — if God wills — as the day in which the clear will of the church members affirmed its people in a new way, stating:

The church stands here under the cross of Jesus Christ —

The German people stands there, which under the symbol of the swastika has awakened.

In past decades, the subversive powers of liberalism, materialism, and Bolshevism alienated millions of German people’s comrades from the German nation. It is doubtless God’s grace that our Führer Adolf Hitler has once again won back to the nation the German people’s comrade and the German worker. Hitler could and had to achieve his goal, because he broke totally from the past and followed the entirely different, yet ancient, path of National Socialism.

In past decades, these satanic powers alienated millions of our German people’s comrades from the Evangelical Church. It is the holy duty and solemn goal of our movement of faith, the “German Christians,” to win back the German people’s comrade and the German worker, with God’s help, to the Evangelical Church. To do that, we want to, and must, follow a different, yet ancient path in the church, namely the path of Martin Luther that leads to a deep connection of church and people, of Christianity and German nature.

The cross of Christ and the swastika should not and may not oppose each other; they belong together. One must make us look to eternity, and admonish us” Remember that you are a Christian! The other points us toward the present, and admonishes us: Remember that you are a German!

Both together should and do admonish us:


Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Overplaying the hate card

Saturday, March 31st, 2012

If Oscars were awarded for liberal hysteria, California’s Rep. Barbara Lee would be a perennial contender. On Tuesday, at a congressional forum on the shooting death of Florida teen Trayvon MartinMs. Lee proclaimed that it was the result of “a toxic and deadly mix.”

“While this issue has shocked American culture, it hasn’t shocked me,” she said in a press statement. “The combination of the powerful gun lobby, racial profiling and hate crimes makes this local matter one of national attention.”

Who knew that the alleged shooter (did you notice how fast the word “alleged” disappeared in news reports?), neighborhood watch memberGeorge Zimmerman, was possessed by all those evil spirits when he began following Mr. Martin before the tragic confrontation on Feb. 26? Or that people who defend the Second Amendment are somehow responsible?

The New Black Panther Party, last seen intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling place in 2008, has offered a $10,000 reward for the “capture” of Mr. Zimmerman, who has not been arrested as of this writing. The police say he acted in self-defense. Maybe so, maybe not, but we won’t know until all the facts come out.

Speaking of which, as Trayvon’s own problems with the law come to light, organizers of racially charged mass marches want any such facts suppressed, contending that asking questions amounts to smearing the dead. On the other hand, Mr. Zimmerman, identified constantly as “white-Hispanic,” is fair game. The whole thing is a sad, terrible business that unscrupulous race baiters are making worse.

So far, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.’s Justice Department, which withdrew the Black Panther voter case despite a conviction, has issued no public warning to the Panthers that they might be flirting with incitement or intimidation. The Justice Department also has ignored the execution-style shooting of two white British tourists in Sarasota, Fla., last April by a black teen who has been convicted of murder. President Obama, who has fanned racial flames in the Trayvon Martin case, apparently has ignored three letters from a friend of the slain tourists, who told the British press that he thinks the absence of presidential condolence is because the case has no “political value.”

Meanwhile, at the request of New York Democratic Sen. Charles E. Schumer, the Justice Department is reviewing the constitutionality of state laws that allow people to use force in their own defense. The “stand your ground” laws are meant to spare people who defend themselves from being sued by assailants. Liberals hate those laws because they reinforce the Second Amendment and interfere with the paradigm of criminal as victim.

The left’s constant accusations are getting a bit thick. Last month, an NAACP delegation actually complained to the United Nations in Geneva that state photo ID laws that prevent vote fraud are a violation of “human rights.”

In Loudoun County, Va., a local Democrat-owned newspaper, the Loudoun Times-Mirror, ran a banner headline on Wednesday that screamed: “Delgaudio’s advocacy group an anti-gay hate group, SPLC claims.”

Eugene Delgaudio is a county supervisor and founder of Public Advocate of the United States, a conservative advocacy group. SPLC is the Southern Poverty Law Center, which began as a small group fighting racism and morphed into a fabulously wealthy bully used by the left to apply the “hate” stamp to people and groups with whom the left disagrees.

The SPLC tracks real hate groups such as skinheads, neo-Nazis and the like, and when it does, it performs a valuable public service as an early-warning system. But recently, SPLC jumped the shark, lumping orthodox Christian outfits like the Family Research Council, Coral Ridge Ministries and others with real hate groups. That’s because those Christian organizations resist the cultural blitzkrieg to accept homosexual and transgender behavior as healthy, normal and unchangeable. The groups contend that people tempted in those ways deserve the same chance for repentance and salvation as everyone else.

Liberals used to play the race card at the drop of a hat. The conservative joke was, “How do you know you’re winning an argument with liberals? They call you a racist.” Now, liberals play the hate card just as often.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has become a mirror of its own allegations. It makes false charges of hate and equates good people with violent extremists. The Anti-Defamation League ought to be all over the SPLC, but it, too, has bought into a radical leftist agenda that redefines traditional morality as a form of hatred.

In a society trained to react in Pavlovian fury toward someone accused of harboring “hate,” this charge is a powerful weapon for crushing dissent. Gradually, people are being conditioned to be race-obsessed and to associate traditional religious morality with bigotry and extremism.

The uneven, overheated nature of hate allegations undermines our cultural consensus that hate really is a bad thing. It cheapens the language, like redefining marriage, as Great Britain’s formerly “Conservative” Party is inexplicably championing. Words are losing their meaning. When the SPLCcalls somebody a “hater,” you don’t really know until you look more closely.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Monmouth police investigate burning of rainbow flag as hate crime

Friday, March 30th, 2012

Police are investigating a flag burning as a hate crime.

Between 1 and 7 a.m. Tuesday in the 600 block of East 11th Ave., someone set fire to a rainbow flag — a symbol of gay pride — at the home of DuWayne Brooks. Brooks, a Vietnam War veteran and life-long resident of Monmouth, opened his curtains to his front porch that morning and saw his rainbow flag lying on his deck, burned about half-way. The deck also sustain burns.

Brooks has had a prosthetic leg below his left knee as a result of diabetes. If the fire from the flag had spread, he could have become trapped.

‘I just haven’t been able to put a good grasp on this at all. I’m afraid to be in my own home,’ Brooks said.

Brooks said he and his friends in the local gay community typically have experienced ‘all kinds of love’ and support in Monmouth. After hanging the flag in October, Brooks had experienced no trouble or threats, until Tuesday.

‘I’m not shy about who I am. … I am who I am,’ Brooks said.

Monmouth Police Chief Bill Feithen said the incident will be classified as criminal damage to property and a hate crime. Patrols in the area have been increase, and the investigation continues.
‘To my knowledge, this is an isolated incident. We certainly take it seriously and it shouldn’t be tolerated,’ Feithen said.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Author Harry Crews dies

Friday, March 30th, 2012

Author Harry Crews, a hell-raiser and cult favorite whose hard and crazy times inspired his brutal tales of the rural South, died Wednesday in Gainesville, Fla. He was 76 and had suffered from neuropathy, said his ex-wife, Sally Ellis Crews.

He had been very ill,” she told the Associated Press on Thursday. “In a way it was kind of a blessing. He was in a lot of pain.” Thanks in part to motorcycle accidents and nerve damage in his feet, he had walked with a cane in recent years. But his career remained active. An excerpt from a forthcoming memoir had been published in theGeorgia Review and there was talk of reissuing his books, many of them out of print, in digital editions.

He wasn’t widely known, but those who knew him— whether personally or through his books — became devoted. A wild man and truth teller in the tradition ofCharles Bukowski and Hunter Thompson, he wrote bloodied stories drawn directly from his own experiences, including boxing and karate. Crews sported a tattoo with a line from an E.E. Cummings poem, “How do you like your blue-eyed boy Mister Death,” on his right bicep under the tattoo of a skull.

“My nose has been broken I think six times,” he said in an undated interview with the online magazine VICE.

“For a long time I never knew which side of my face it was gonna be on from year to year. But I liked boxing for a long, long time and I like karate and I like blood sports. I like a lot of things that are really not fashionable and really not very nice and which finally, if you’ve got any sense at all, you know, are totally indefensible. Anybody who is going to defend much of the way I’ve spent my life is mad.”

Crews wrote 17 novels, including Feast of Snakes and The Knockout Artist; numerous short stories and novellas and the memoir A Childhood. He also taught graduate and undergraduate fiction writing workshops at the University of Florida from 1968 until his retirement in 1997.

He liked to say that once he had written 500 words, he considered it a good day’s work. In a 1992 interview with Tammy Lytal and Richard D. Russell at Memphis State University, Crews said about writing, “If you’re gonna write, for God in heaven’s sake, try to get naked. Try to write the truth. Try to get underneath all the sham, all the excuses, all the lies that you’ve been told.”

Crews was born June 7, 1935, in Bacon County, Ga., the son of a sharecropper. His father died in his sleep before Harry was 2, a tragedy that would haunt him long after. InA Childhood, published in 1997, Crews wrote about growing up in poverty and without books, except for the Bible. He remembered the shame of having to move around.

“Ever since I reached manhood, I have looked back upon that time when I was a boy and thought how marvelous beyond saying it must be to spend the first 10 or 15 years of your life in the same house — the home place — moving among the same furniture, seeing on the familiar walls the same pictures of blood kin,” he wrote. “But because we were driven from pillar to post when I was a child, there is nowhere I can think of as the home place.”

His childhood alone tested the imagination. His mother married his father’s brother, a violent drunk. Crews suffered from infantile paralysis and once fell into a vat of boiling water, confining him to his bed for months. Still, he managed to become the first member of his family to graduate from high school, after which he joined the Marine Corps. In the book Getting Naked with Harry Crews, he explained to interviewer Hank Nuwer that his military service was crucial.

“If I hadn’t gone in the Marine Corps, I wouldn’t be a professor in the university. I’d be in the state prison because I was a bad actor and a bad boy.”

Crews also freely acknowledged his problems with alcohol.

“Alcohol whipped me. Alcohol and I had many marvelous times together. We laughed, we talked, we danced at the party; then one day I woke up and the band had gone home and I was lying in the broken glass with a shirt full of puke and I said, ‘Hey, man, the ball game’s up,’” Crews once said in a profile written by Chicago Tribune columnist Mary T. Schmich.

He had dreamed of being a writer since childhood, when he would read through the Sears catalog. Thanks to the GI Bill, he attended the University of Florida and graduated in 1960. Crews wrote fiction throughout the decade and his first novel, Gospel Singer, came out in 1968. Several more novels followed, including Car and The Hawk is Dying, adapted into a 2006 film of the same name starring Paul Giamatti and Michelle Williams.

But he really caught on thanks to his columns and essays for Playboy and Esquire in the 1970s and after. He wrote profiles on everyone from Charles Bronson to white supremacist David Duke and traveled to Alaska for Playboy, completing a 7,500-word story about the impact of the energy pipeline on the city of Valdez. “Going Down in Valdez” concluded with a young prostitute receiving a butterfly-shaped tattoo, a scene he likened to Alaska itself.

“If Alaska is not our young whore, what is she?” he wrote. “If we scar her, leave her with pestilence and corrupted with infection, irrefutably marked with our own private design, who can blame us?”

Crews did not look or act like your typical college professor, shaving his head or wearing a Mohawk and making every literature lecture a performance. Other writers described him as “riveting,” especially when he was talking about writing.

“A writer’s job is to get naked, to hide nothing, to look away from nothing, to look at it,” he wrote. “To not blink, to not be embarrassed by it or ashamed of it. Strip it down and let’s get to where the blood is, where the bone is.”

Crews was married to Sally Ellis Crews twice; she has his power of attorney and said they remained “great friends” since their second divorce in 1972. The couple had two children: Patrick, who drowned as a child in 1964 and Byron, who lives in Ohio.

He did not want a funeral service or a viewing, said his ex-wife, who added that Crews wanted to be cremated.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Self education in bravery never ends in life.

Thursday, March 29th, 2012

We can all probably find opportunity in life, in war or in peace, to learn bravery. Recklessness is not bravery!

Avoidable losses diminish any victory. They are not sacrifices, but mistakes.

Bravery requires thought, a consideration of the goal of a courageous decision. What can I achieve if I leave cover, what can I destroy before the enemy destroys me.

We learn to be brave only by thinking. Few receive bravery as the gift of fate. For many, bravery is the result of victory over weakness. The more we know our weaknesses, comrade, the better we can learn to be brave. Never give in to weakness when it attacks us, resist it, fight cowardice, ask what it is good for.

It can never tolerate that question!

For weakness must answer that it is good for nothing, that it is the beginning of all evil.

But then you will be able to find this answer: “To be brave is good!” That is the answer to cowardice. Remember that, comrade, both the question and the answer!

It is the answer of a great man who found faith as he experienced a German attack.

A word on bravery in a war of materiel. There is an outwardly intelligent fear that gives but a limited yes to the final exertion. It says yes to “an honorable soldier’s death in open battle,” but then finds a hundred ifs and buts: gas, mines, bombs, the colored, darkness, water and the like.

Away with this false cleverness!

Men determine the outcome, not matériél.

Means can be found and overcome. “He who looks into the abyss with eagle’s eyes — he has courage.” There are a thousand means, but a single death, a thousand possibilities, but only one character. High explosives are no pleasanter than gas, Levisit no deadlier than Bethlehem Steel, the English blockade no more humane than Negroes with knives in their mouths.

The value of a man or of his life does not depend on the means of death. Rather, be prepared for the unexpected!

To expect the unexpected means to have overcome it in advance. The burdens of war cannot be chosen.

Not the particular choice, but the decision, is decisive.

The last sacrifice reveals either a whole life or half a life.

The whole life overcomes death before encountering it. The real man strives for a whole life, defying death, laughing at it, as our ancestors teach us in the “Edda,” or as we read in a letter from one who fell during the World War: “I am free to risk everything. My eternity belongs to God, my life to the fatherland. To me remains joy and strength.”

***

Rich or poor?

You ask, comrade. But the war does not! Only defeat asks.

It wants the poor to be still poorer, those with possessions to lose them.

To be still poorer means slavery, it means deportation and chaos or unemployment. What those who possess something at least have until their defeat, those without possessions will never enjoy. All hope is lost. To be without possessions is the last form of being without weapons. The winner wins, the loser loses.

Every one who is defeated loses, whether rich or poor. War makes no distinctions.

Still, it is valuable for you to know that it is far worse to lose hope than to lose dead possessions.

Defeat takes no more or no less from anyone. It takes everything! Also you and me!

Germany’s poorest son was its best during the last war, and also the most intelligent!

What a lost peace withheld from him twenty years ago, our peace will guarantee to him who remains loyal and brave, not holding to his private possessions.

He who says “I have nothing to lose!” is a liar and a fool. Friend, it is not a matter of losing, but of gaining.

For everyone!

Our Reich is socialist.

What our nation gains benefits everyone who in the past lacked everything that the German money state and social state withheld.

And how much better will our socialism be with the means that the money-sack powers would rather have burned or thrown into the sea than have sold to us.

Not only poor people, but poor countries are convinced that our victory will lead to new ways of prosperity for all.

Rich or poor, comrade, is a question that this war will solve not only for us, but for all of Europe. For everyone!

***

War weddings and war children.

Yes or no?

The question was asked frequently during the weeks of waiting. Life gave the answer. The greatest thing in this war is that the “yes” was so clear.

There were 1.6 million births in the first war year 1939. That is 300,000 more than in England and France together. Three times as many children here as in France. In a hundred years, there will be more than 100 million Germans in Europe, but only 5 million Englanders!

There the birth rate is falling, here it is rising; there hopelessness, here the faith of a rising birthrate. In 1939, 100,000 more couples married than in the peaceful year 1938! During 1914, the first year of the World War, there were 500,000 fewer marriages than in the year before! That is evidence of long-range confidence and assurance of victory.

Most soldiers in the Maginot Line have neither brothers nor sisters.

There, more coffins than cradles, here laughing life. There so many dead even before the first battle, here even before victory the weapon of life.

Do not think it reckless marry during war and have children. He who lives on in his children only half dies. The woman who loses her husband but has his children has defeated death, and is stronger than fate. Blood lives on. When war kills the last of a line, a hundred die at once.

Do not think it reckless to have even more children during war.

One helps the other. Many children means a lot of work.

And work for the whole economy, not only for the household. The number of people determines the number of requests, the amount of work.

Work, as we have learned during the years of progress, is the way to happiness. Each child left is a milestone on the way to happiness.

You may doubt that friend, since the grayness of everyday life seems to depend on others.

Forget these doubts!

Learn faith that our new age is overcoming the past, that the present difficult battles of our children of every class will come out well in the end.

Our sacrifice will make our children free.

The greatness of our victory will lead to an even greater people.

The great harvest will need more barns.

***

[The next page reproduces a page from Hitler’s World War I paybook, which lists the battles he fought in. It includes the following text.]

The first solder of the Reich. The achievements of the Führer as a front line soldier. What other people has ever had such a statesman?

Adolf Hitler’s pay book, with a list of battles. Our war, too, has given bloody proof of the dangerous nature of the Führer’s military service. The first death on the Western Front in 1939 was a corporal on courier duty.

***

The Führer is fulfilling a mission.

His life is his mission.

His battle is our battle.

He who has taken an oath to the Führer, as have we who swore to him in faith when we were inducted, are also bound by oath to the Führer’s mission.

All of us — each soldier — is fulfilling a mission today. It is the Führer’s mission for Europe’s peace. We thought we could fulfill this mission within Germany. But envy and baseness preferred to sacrifice Europe rather than to tolerate Germany’s rise.

Germany’s freedom, and the freedom of Europe, depend upon a German victory. When the enemy wanted war, the Führer made peace with Russia. That shows the strength of his desire for peace.

Comrade, your life and my life belong to this great peace mission. Our lives are the Führer’s mission. To separate ourselves from the Führer is to separate ourselves from life. It would mean our death for all eternity.

To fulfill our mission to the last breath makes us immortal, even if we must fall, for the flag is more than death.

How small, how tiny, how filthy in character are those who even dare to make the attempt to separate us from the Führer. They want to take from us the Führer given to us by God!

And not only through force, but through paper. With leaflets!

Powers that so underestimate us are contemptible. Such base attempts are evidence of the justice of our glowing hatred against these enemies. He who would like to make us so base is himself base. If we stop them, it will beas good for the world as it will be bad for the Jewish underworld.

I am a German. I believe in my people. I believe in its honor. I believe in its future. I believe in justice for it, and I will fight for this justice. I fight for its freedom, and I fight for a better peace than the cursed and hateful peace of the past. I believe that and affirm that in the name of my people before the entire world.

— Adolf Hitler

***

A renaissance of ethnicity.

If we feel that this war is for the ordering of Europe, for a better ordering of the continent, for its liberation from warmongers and the murderers of nations, then we must also see that Europe is waiting for us.

Not the envious, everyday Europe, but rather the other Europe, just as there is also another England without poison gas concerns on the royal throne.

Money ruined politicians.

No Rothschild will transform the blood of our battles into stock certificates. Nobler values are taking the stage.

We are not exporting our worldview!

We are fulfilling a law of nature in human life, a higher law of our epoch, by proclaiming the victory of blood, the right of ethnicity. This is a truly godly law: the right of the highest life force of an ethnic group.

There is no higher law on this earth!

Ireland is one example of many:

For 750 years, little Ireland fought relentlessly against Great Britain. Its sacrifice in blood and wealth is unparalleled, the horror and hardness is unlimited, the proud sorrow of the ethnic fanatic nameless. In 1921, three million Irish were victors over a world power, against all the means used against them.

Over 600,000 Italians live in the south of France!

Neither the jails of Hungary nor Czechoslovakia stopped Father Hlinka until there was a free Slovakia. World power and world stock exchanges, world fleets and a world church, are not enough to hinder the victory of ethnicity. The doctrine of human equality is mocked. The doctrine of humanity is silenced.

To be a people is a holy affirmation by billions. World Jewry or World Freemasonry, or whatever other dark powers striving for world domination there may be, ethnicity will defeat them all!

Not always gladly, often against their will, but it is absolutely certain wherever blood awakes. As the Irish tortured the English, so it will be elsewhere. How many other ethnic groups in Europe want justice and peace?

Comrades, the world is waiting for us!

That means: march.

We remember our own ethnic victory a thousand times from the Greater German year of the loudspeaker[1938]: One People, one Reich, one Führer! A victory against a world of enemies, against the front of the counter race, that is a victory that brings true peace to the peoples: the victory of ethnic freedom!

The campaign in the East at the beginning of this war gave vivid proof of this:

A word from the Führer, a single word, and 200,000 people left what had been their homeland for centuries.

In the middle of the war, over a distance as great as that from Tilsit to Vienna, in temperatures of -40 C., they left the rich black soil of the Warthegau, perhaps leaving their possessions behind. They come.

They come with horse and wagon, and because Hitler needs iron, the wagon carries not only wife and children, hay and food, but also the old oven. They travel 80 kilometers a day.

They come.

Forgotten for centuries by the Reich, left as outposts, the Reich calls the Baltic Germans in the middle of the war.

The Führer calls.

They come.

A referendum under foreign supervision, but despite war and hatred: of 100 voters, 100 voted for their people. It was no less powerful than the independent referendum of nearly 200,000 people’s comrades in Tyrolia, in the middle of the war! That is the miracle of a new world, the renaissance of ethnicity. Faith without borders!

Comrade, do not disappoint that faith! Never!

They believe in the victory of ethnicity, and in us, in Hitler’s soldiers, a vctory that will bring peace.

We may recognize the law of a higher power, and faithfully fulfill it. We thank the Creator who gave us such fruitful times. We want to stand fast, comrade, and fulfill that law we are fighting for:

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Israel, Palestine and the anti-Semitism of the Left

Thursday, March 29th, 2012

Nick Cohen has a characteristically good article on “anti-Semitism of the Left” in the April edition of Standpoint. The argument he advances is a fair one. Anti-Semitism has been found across the political spectrum. In Britain the anti-Semitism of the Left was often directed at bankers and financiers. This was the anti-Semitism of Belloc and Chesterton.

But there was also an anti-Semitism of the generally decent liberal elite. In the introduction to Harold Nicolson’s Diaries and Letters (utterly addictive – I go back to them time and again), his son Nigel, wrote that his father “knew that he belonged to an elite, an elite more of intelligence and achievement than of birth, and he tended to feel that people outside that elite had something wrong with them: Business-men, for example, the humbler type of schoolmaster or clergyman, most women, actors, most Americans, Jews, all coloured or Levantine peoples, and the great mass of the middle and working classes.”

This is a splendid array of prejudices, which I guess most people today will find shocking. Nigel Nicolson might have added the Tory Party to that list, for Harold detested it – even though many of his friends and his beloved wife Vita Sackville-West were Tories. He entered Parliament as a member of Ramsay MacDonald’s tiny National Labour Party, and after the war contested a by-election in Croydon as the Labour candidate despite his feeling that “the great mass of the middle and working classes … had something wrong with them”. Who ever thought people were simple?

As to the Jews, here is a Diary entry (11 July, 1930): “We go on afterwards to the Woolfs. Hugh Dalton is there. I attack the nomination board at the Foreign Office” – Nicolson had recently resigned from the FO – “not on the grounds that it rejects good men, but on the grounds that its very existence prevents good men from coming up for fear that they may be ploughed for social reasons. The awkward question of the Jews arises. I admit that is the snag. Jews are far more interested in international life than are Englishmen, and if we opened the service it might be flooded with clever Jews. It was a little difficult to argue this point frankly with Leonard there” – Leonard Woolf, husband of Virginia, being himself Jewish.

This is a very English anti-Semitism: let’s keep the Jews out because they are too clever. Harold Nicolson’s anti-Semitism was of the mild milk-and-water type. He had a flirtation with Sir Oswald Mosley – in, it should be said, Mosley’s New Party days before he came out as a Fascist and indulged in his own opportunistic anti-Semitism. Nevertheless Nicolson was uncompromisingly anti-Nazi and a consistent critic of Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement policy. Whatever his own distaste for Jews, he was disgusted, long before the opening of the Death Camps, by the discrimination, humiliations and persecution they suffered at the hands of the Nazis. Indignation was stronger than his prejudices.

Today the anti-Semitism of the Left takes the form of hostility to Israel or, if you prefer, of anti-Zionism. Nick Cohen generously admits that there is some justification for this: “Those who say that the bias of much leftist protest is a reason to exonerate Israel miss the point that injustice in Palestine is still injustice, anti-Semitism plays a part in Israel-hating … but many who defend the rights of Palestinians are not fanatics … They oppose Israeli policy because contrary to the Balfour Declaration it impinges on the civil rights of non-Jewish communities.” Early in his essay he quotes the key sentence of that Declaration from the British Foreign Secretary: that the Empire would allow the Jewish people to find a home in Palestine, “it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities.”

However well-intentioned – some think it was cynical – the Balfour Declaration led to difficulties. Promises to Jews were incompatible with promises to Arabs, and so, almost a hundred years later, supporting the State of Israel contra mundum, and the policies of successive Israeli governments makes justice for the Palestinians impossible. Yet supporting the Palestinian cause may threaten the very existence of Israel.

Is it possible to reject and deplore anti-Semitism while also deploring the policies of the Israeli state? Yes, of course it is, difficult though it may be to hold this line. For one thing, you may believe that the aggressive intransigence of Benjamin Netanyahu is not in the long-term interest of Israel; that Israel cannot survive forever embattled. For another, a great many Israelis think this too. As Cohen writes, there is a workable solution: “Most Israelis and most Palestinians favour a compromise, which includes a fair distribution of land, an end to violence, and security – essentially dividing the country on 1967 lines.” But: “Compromise is as much an anathema to the far Left and the Islamists as it is to the Israeli and American Right. Increasingly, it is anathema to the liberal Left too.”

Harold Nicolson in the 1930s could dislike Jews and yet condemn the Nazi persecutions. Someone who still regards himself as a friend of Israel can nevertheless condemn Israeli treatment of Palestinians in the West Bank, and argue that it is not only morally wrong, but will prove self-defeating. Israel needs a statesman with the vision of F W de Klerk, who dismantled apartheid, and, in doing so, secured the future of white South Africans.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Plea bargains considered in AG cross-burning case

Thursday, March 29th, 2012

Four people accused of burning an 11-foot cross near a mixed-race family’s Arroyo Grande home, continued Wednesday to consider plea bargains that were offered by the prosecution.

Negotiations between defense attorneys and the prosecution inside San Luis Obispo County Superior Court Judge Jacquelyn Duffy’s chambers ended without result as court closed for the day. No details were released about what penalties the four may face, though counter offers have been made.

Jason W. Kahn, 36, of Orcutt, William Soto, 20 of Arroyo Grande, and Sara K. Matheny, 24, and Jeremiah L. Hernandez, 32, both of San Simeon, face charges of arson, cross-burning, terrorism, conspiracy to burn a cross and hate-crime enhancements. All have pleaded not guilty and remain jailed.

The four defendants did not talk to each other Wednesday as they have throughout the proceedings. They seemed very serious and did not make eye contact with friends and family members in the courtroom.

Duffy, who set the jury trail for May, also ruled that potential jurors will be allowed to hear about the death of Jason Kahn’s father, Ricky Kahn, who was killed at the site of the cross-burning by sheriff’s deputies in 1994.

Defense attorneys say the four were there to honor the memory of Kahn’s father, and flowers were also placed there. That’s the motivation for the cross burning and it has nothing to do with a hate crime, they said.

Jason Kahn’s attorney, Trace Milan, has argued none of the defendants knew the family even lived there.

Prosecutor David Pomeroy maintained the details about Kahn’s father are not relevant and “have nothing to do with the case.” The actions of the accused were a “threat,” Pomeroy said.

Duffy, who also ruled that the defense attorney cannot have the sheriff’s report detailing the death of the elder Kahn, has labeled the cross burning “reckless.”

Defense motions that seek all police interviews, 9-1-1 recordings, reports and other evidence will continue next month.

Matheny’s attorney, Trevor C. Creel, has argued the cross burning was “symbolic speech,”  and should be protected by the First Amendment.

Hernandez’s attorney, Raymond Allen, said his client was not even at the scene and points out that he’s Native American and Hispanic. He has asked for a separate trial because of fears of guilt by association when jurors hear talk about a white supremacist gang, something that is expected to be brought up if the case goes to trial.

The accused are not charged with the theft of the cross from St. John’s Lutheran Church in Arroyo Grande, court records show.

The cross burning happened March 19, 2011, in a vacant lot on South Elm Street adjacent to the family’s home and the window of a 19-year-old woman

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Cartoons from Kladderadatsch (1934)

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

Background: These cartoons all come from 1934 issues of Kladderadatsch, a leading German satirical weekly that quickly adopted to National Socialism. These cartoons reflect the Nazi propaganda line at the time: Germany wanted peace, whereas the rest of the world was preparing for war.

For those who read German, the full run of Kladderadatsch (1850-1944) is available on-line through the University of Heidelberg.Simplicissimus, another leading satirical magazine, is also available.

 

 Kladderadatsch cartoon
The title: “In the new Garden of Eden.” France, personified as Eve, is being seduced by the serpent of the armaments industry.Source: Issue #15/1933.

 Kladderadatsch
 The caption: “French secret report. Germany’s rearmament is in full swing, and its fighting spirit incomparable.” The wheelbarrow says: “On to the battle of labor.” The point is that Germany is building its economy, not weapons. It comes from the same issue as the cartoon immediately above.

Source: Issue #15/1933.

 FDR, Kladderadatsch cartoon
 The caption: “International chess tournament.” The Western powers, with all their weapons, are being driven into the corner by the pawns, the common people. Note the French colonial soldier.

Source: Issue #17/1933.

 Racism in America
 Caption: “America for the ‘Americans’! The extraordinary increase in the population of Negroes and Jews is causing headaches for the more established Americans.”

Source: Issue #23/1933.

 HItler visits Italy
 Hitler visits Italy to make peace, while an unhappy France, accompanied by the God of War, watches.

Source: Issue #27/1933

 Jews and World War I
 The center shows a memorial to the ten million dead of World War I. Two Jews stand beneath. One says: “Why shouldn’t we risk a war? We won’t have to fight in it.”

Source: Issue #31/1933

 Hitler and the Night of the Long Knives
 This cartoon appeared immediately after the Night of the Long Knives. The title: “Loyalty. The Führer’s major speech on the events of 30 June.” At bottom, a quotation from Hermann Göring: “The German people knows: The greater the need, the greater always is the Führer!”

Source: Issue #31/1933.

 The French-Soviet agreement
 France and the Soviet Union had agreed on a treaty. The USSR is personified as a bear, France as a tiger. “Europe, you can rest easy!”

Source: Issue #39/1933.

 The Communist menage
 This cartoon suggests the danger of Communism, as red insects infest Europe. The caption: “Europe, defend your holiest treasures!”

Source: Issue #43/1933.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

Abandoned In Fight Against Racism – Anti-Nazi Groups Struggle To Find Funding

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

 
while Germany tentatively prepares a bid to ban the far-right NPD party, anti-racism groups complain that they are chronically underfunded and sometimes even face obstruction from the authorities. They say their fight to stop young people from becoming extremists is more important than getting rid of the NPD.

 

German authorities are gradually preparing a legal bid to ban the far-right National Democratic Party and have announced the arrest of dozens of fugitive neo-Nazis this year following bitter criticism of their failure to stop the so-called Zwickau cell of terrorists from murdering and bombing immigrants.

 

But human rights campaigners, politicians and researchers say the government is neglecting crucial work being done to combat xenophobia in regions where right-wing extremism is rife. Anti-racism groups complain that they face a constant struggle to obtain funding.

 

For example, anti-Nazi activists in the Sachsische Schweiz (“Saxon Switzerland“) region south of Dresden have been organizing lectures and training courses and setting up exhibitions and youth exchanges with young people from Poland. Such projects usually get only temporary financing.

 

Once the funding expires, the work stops, forcing the staff to claim unemployment benefits. The same is true of similar projects across the country.

 

“It takes years before local authorities even start taking you seriously,” says political scientist Dierk Borstel, who works on pro-democracy projects in the northeastern region of Mecklenberg-Western Pomerania, where support for the NPD is particularly strong partly because established parties have given up trying to woo voters there. The region has been neglected since unification in 1990, argues Borstel.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share

One in Five Young Asians Think Honour Violence Can Be Justified

Tuesday, March 27th, 2012

Some three per cent even think murder, or so-called “honour killings”, can be justified in some circumstances

And two thirds of young British Asians, including young women, say families should live according to the concept of “honour”, according to the poll for BBC Panorama.

The findings come despite attempts by politicians, the police and prosecutors to send out a strong message that honour-based violence is unacceptable.

Police fear as many as 12 people a year are victims of honour killings in the UK and a recent survey suggested there are more than 2,800 honour crimes committed annually—the equivalent of eight a day.

Last week, the mother of a teenager stabbed to death by her Asian boyfriend claimed her daughter was the first white victim of an honour killing.

Laura Wilson, 17, was repeatedly knifed in the head on a secluded tow path by Ashtiaq Ashgar in 2010 after their relationship turned sour. He was subsequently jailed for at least17-and-a-half years.

In the most high profile case, five men were eventually jailed over the 2006 murder of Banaz Mahmod, including her own father.

The lead prosecutor for honour crimes warned the latest survey reveals campaigners now face a new generation of supports of honour violence.

Nazir Afzal, from the Crown Prosecution Service, said: “I thought this was a generational thing, it was something that would die out with my generation.

“Unfortunately, I’ve come across many young people who think the same way.”

The survey of 500 Asian men aged 16 to 34 was conducted for a Panorama investigation in to honour crimes.

It found 18 per cent thought punishments on women could be justified in some circumstances if they had dishonoured their family.

That could include disobeying a father’s wishes, wanting to marry someone the family or community considered unacceptable, going out in the evening unaccompanied or dressing in an unacceptable manner.

Three per cent said honour killing could be justified while a similar proportion were undecided.

Some 69 per cent said families should live according to the concept of honour of “izzat”.

Mr Afzal told Panorama: “We don’t know the true figure of honour killings. It’s anything between 10 and 12 a year in this country.

“I don’t know how many other unmarked graves there are in our green and pleasant land, I don’t know. And that suggests to me that we’re underestimating this issue.

“My view is there’s no place for multicultural sensitivity in this situation . . . This is something that we cannot tolerate.”

Jasvinder Sanghera, of Karma Nirvana, set up a helpline for women at risk of honour based violence. At 14, she was imprisoned in her bedroom after refusing to marry a man she had never met.

“I was conditioned to learn that from a very young age, it is dishonourable to make eye contact with men, sit with men,” she said.

“And the rules shift and change as you get older, you’re not allowed to have boyfriends, be seen talking to the opposite sex, to cut your hair, wear make-up. You are taught these are all dishonourable acts of behaviour.”

In 2010, Mohammed Ali and Omar Hussain were jailed for life for the murder of Banaz Mahmod in January 2006, after being extradited from Iraq.

The men carried out the murder with a third man, Mohammad Hama, on behalf of Miss Mahmod’s father, Mahmod Mahmod, and his brother, Ari.

Hama and Miss Mahmod’s father and uncle, members of the Kurdish community, were jailed at the Old Bailey in 2007.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
Share